Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26804781›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2016

Comparison of 3D orientation distribution functions measured with confocal microscopy and diffusion MRI.

Kurt Schilling, Vaibhav Janve, Yurui Gao, Iwona Stepniewska, Bennett A Landman, Adam W Anderson

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. White matter tract crossing and bottleneck regions in the fetal brain.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Diffusion MRI with Machine Learning.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Deep Constrained Spherical Deconvolution for Robust Harmonization.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2023
    Article
  20. Review

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kurt SchillingVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA. Electronic address: kurt.g.schilling@vanderbilt.edu.
Vaibhav JanveVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Yurui GaoVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Iwona StepniewskaDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Bennett A LandmanVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Electrical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Adam W AndersonVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.

Funding

The Biological Basis of Diffusion MRI of the BrainR01NS058639 · NINDS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI ANDERSON, ADAM W · 2008 to 2016
$3.7M
NCRR NIH HHS 1S10 RR 17789NINDS NIH HHS 2R01NS058639-05/08NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS058639
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability of diffusion MRI (dMRI) fiber tractography to non-invasively map three-dimensional (3D) anatomical networks in the human brain has made it a valuable tool in both clinical and research settings. However, there are many assumptions inherent to any tractography algorithm that can limit the accuracy of the reconstructed fiber tracts. Among them is the assumption that the diffusion-weighted images accurately reflect the underlying fiber orientation distribution (FOD) in the MRI voxel. Consequently, validating dMRI's ability to assess the underlying fiber orientation in each voxel is critical for its use as a biomedical tool. Here, using post-mortem histology and confocal microscopy, we present a method to perform histological validation of orientation functions in 3D, which has previously been limited to two-dimensional analysis of tissue sections. We demonstrate the ability to extract the 3D FOD from confocal z-stacks, and quantify the agreement between the MRI estimates of orientation information obtained using constrained spherical deconvolution (CSD) and the true geometry of the fibers. We find an orientation error of approximately 6° in voxels containing nearly parallel fibers, and 10-11° in crossing fiber regions, and note that CSD was unable to resolve fibers crossing at angles below 60° in our dataset. This is the first time that the 3D white matter orientation distribution is calculated from histology and compared to dMRI. Thus, this technique serves as a gold standard for dMRI validation studies - providing the ability to determine the extent to which the dMRI signal is consistent with the histological FOD, and to establish how well different dMRI models can predict the ground truth FOD.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsBrainBrain MappingDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalMicroscopy, ConfocalSaimiriCrossing fibersDiffusion MRIDTIFiber orientation distributionValidation

Identifiers

PMID26804781
PMCPMC4803575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.