Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26804553›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2016

Robust DNA Methylation in the Clonal Raider Ant Brain.

Romain Libbrecht, Peter Robert Oxley, Laurent Keller, Daniel Jan Christoph Kronauer

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
24.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 169 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genome Evolution in Social Insects.Genome biology and evolution · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Transgenerational epigenetic effect of kings' aging on offspring's caste fate mediated by sperm DNA methylation in termites.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Romain LibbrechtLaboratory of Social Evolution and Behavior, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065, USA; Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland. Electronic address: romain.libbrecht@gmail.com.
Peter Robert OxleyLaboratory of Social Evolution and Behavior, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Laurent KellerDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Daniel Jan Christoph KronauerLaboratory of Social Evolution and Behavior, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Rockefeller University · USUniversity of Lausanne · CH

Funding

Studying the molecular mechanisms of social life using a novel ant model systemDP2GM105454 · NIGMS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI KRONAUER, DANIEL · 2012 to 2012
$2.5M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS 1DP2GM105454-01NIGMS NIH HHS DP2 GM105454
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social insects are promising model systems for epigenetics due to their immense morphological and behavioral plasticity. Reports that DNA methylation differs between the queen and worker castes in social insects [1-4] have implied a role for DNA methylation in regulating division of labor. To better understand the function of DNA methylation in social insects, we performed whole-genome bisulfite sequencing on brains of the clonal raider ant Cerapachys biroi, whose colonies alternate between reproductive (queen-like) and brood care (worker-like) phases [5]. Many cytosines were methylated in all replicates (on average 29.5% of the methylated cytosines in a given replicate), indicating that a large proportion of the C. biroi brain methylome is robust. Robust DNA methylation occurred preferentially in exonic CpGs of highly and stably expressed genes involved in core functions. Our analyses did not detect any differences in DNA methylation between the queen-like and worker-like phases, suggesting that DNA methylation is not associated with changes in reproduction and behavior in C. biroi. Finally, many cytosines were methylated in one sample only, due to either biological or experimental variation. By applying the statistical methods used in previous studies [1-4, 6] to our data, we show that such sample-specific DNA methylation may underlie the previous findings of queen- and worker-specific methylation. We argue that there is currently no evidence that genome-wide variation in DNA methylation is associated with the queen and worker castes in social insects, and we call for a more careful interpretation of the available data.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationGenome, InsectAnimalsAntsBrainFemaleSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID26804553
PMCPMC5067136
OpenAlexW2271200887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.