Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26803821›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2016

Digital antimicrobial susceptibility testing using the MilliDrop technology.

L Jiang, L Boitard, P Broyer, A-C Chareire, P Bourne-Branchu, P Mahé, M Tournoud, C Franceschi, G Zambardi, J Baudry and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. The new microbiology: cultivating the future of microbiome-directed medicine.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2020
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods: agar dilution to 3D tissue-engineered models.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2018
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

L JiangLaboratoire de Colloïdes et Matériaux Divisés, Institute of Chemistry, Biology and Innovation, ESPCI ParisTech/CNRS UMR 8231/PSL Research University, Paris, France.
L BoitardMilliDrop Instruments SAS, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2614-5120
P BroyerbioMérieux SA, Marcy l'Etoile, France.
A-C ChareirebioMérieux SA, Marcy l'Etoile, France.
P Bourne-BranchubioMérieux SA, Marcy l'Etoile, France.
P MahébioMérieux SA, Marcy l'Etoile, France.
M TournoudbioMérieux SA, Marcy l'Etoile, France.
C FranceschibioMérieux SA, Marcy l'Etoile, France.
G ZambardibioMérieux SA, Marcy l'Etoile, France.
J BaudryLaboratoire de Colloïdes et Matériaux Divisés, Institute of Chemistry, Biology and Innovation, ESPCI ParisTech/CNRS UMR 8231/PSL Research University, Paris, France.
J BibetteLaboratoire de Colloïdes et Matériaux Divisés, Institute of Chemistry, Biology and Innovation, ESPCI ParisTech/CNRS UMR 8231/PSL Research University, Paris, France. Jerome.bibette@espci.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present the MilliDrop Analyzer (MDA), a droplet-based millifluidic system for digital antimicrobial susceptibility testing (D-AST), which enables us to determine minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) precisely and accurately. The MilliDrop technology was validated by using resazurin for fluorescence readout, for comparison with standard methodology, and for conducting reproducibility studies. In this first assessment, the susceptibility of a reference Gram-negative strain Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 to gentamicin, chloramphenicol, and nalidixic acid were tested by the MDA, VITEK®2, and broth microdilution as a reference standard. We measured the susceptibility of clinically relevant Gram-positive strains of Staphylococcus aureus to vancomycin, including vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (VISA), heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (hVISA), and vancomycin-susceptible S. aureus (VSSA) strains. The MDA provided results which were much more accurate than those of VITEK®2 and standard broth microdilution. The enhanced accuracy enabled us to reliably discriminate between VSSA and hVISA strains.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiniaturizationAnti-Infective Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.