Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26803805›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics2016

Energy Contents of Frequently Ordered Restaurant Meals and Comparison with Human Energy Requirements and U.S. Department of Agriculture Database Information: A Multisite Randomized Study.

Lorien E Urban, Judith L Weber, Melvin B Heyman, Rachel L Schichtl, Sofia Verstraete, Nina S Lowery, Sai Krupa Das, Molly M Schleicher, Gail Rogers, Christina Economos and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Cluster Randomized Trial to Promote Healthy Menu Items for Children: The Kids' Choice Restaurant Program.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2017
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lorien E Urban
Judith L Weber
Melvin B Heyman
Rachel L Schichtl
Sofia Verstraete
Nina S Lowery
Sai Krupa Das
Molly M Schleicher
Gail Rogers
Christina Economos
William A Masters
Susan B Roberts
Jean Mayer Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging · US

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM IN PEDIATRIC GASTROENTEROLOGY/NUTRITIONT32DK007762 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI James Bayrer · 1998 to 2026
$7.3M
NIDDK NIH HHS DK00776NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007762
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExcess energy intake from meals consumed away from home is implicated as a major contributor to obesity, and ∼50% of US restaurants are individual or small-chain (non-chain) establishments that do not provide nutrition information.

objectiveTo measure the energy content of frequently ordered meals in non-chain restaurants in three US locations, and compare with the energy content of meals from large-chain restaurants, energy requirements, and food database information.

designA multisite random-sampling protocol was used to measure the energy contents of the most frequently ordered meals from the most popular cuisines in non-chain restaurants, together with equivalent meals from large-chain restaurants.

settingMeals were obtained from restaurants in San Francisco, CA; Boston, MA; and Little Rock, AR, between 2011 and 2014.

main outcome measuresMeal energy content determined by bomb calorimetry. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS PERFORMED: Regional and cuisine differences were assessed using a mixed model with restaurant nested within region×cuisine as the random factor. Paired t tests were used to evaluate differences between non-chain and chain meals, human energy requirements, and food database values.

resultsMeals from non-chain restaurants contained 1,205±465 kcal/meal, amounts that were not significantly different from equivalent meals from large-chain restaurants (+5.1%; P=0.41). There was a significant effect of cuisine on non-chain meal energy, and three of the four most popular cuisines (American, Italian, and Chinese) had the highest mean energy (1,495 kcal/meal). Ninety-two percent of meals exceeded typical energy requirements for a single eating occasion.

conclusionsNon-chain restaurants lacking nutrition information serve amounts of energy that are typically far in excess of human energy requirements for single eating occasions, and are equivalent to amounts served by the large-chain restaurants that have previously been criticized for providing excess energy. Restaurants in general, rather than specific categories of restaurant, expose patrons to excessive portions that induce overeating through established biological mechanisms.

Indexed as

Energy IntakeFood AnalysisMealsNutritional RequirementsRestaurantsUnited States Department of AgricultureArkansasBostonCalorimetryDatabases, FactualFood LabelingHumansHyperphagiaNutrition PolicyObesitySan FranciscoDietary energyFast foodObesityRestaurantsWeight gain

Identifiers

PMID26803805
PMCPMC5746190
OpenAlexW2257610757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.