Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26803652›Full record

ReviewCurrent diabetes reports2016

Diabetes and Schizophrenia.

Jaana Suvisaari, Jaakko Keinänen, Saana Eskelinen, Outi Mantere

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current diabetes reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jaana SuvisaariMental Health Unit, National Institute for Health and Welfare, P.O.BOX 30, 00271, Helsinki, Finland. jaana.suvisaari@thl.fi.
Jaakko KeinänenMental Health Unit, National Institute for Health and Welfare, P.O.BOX 30, 00271, Helsinki, Finland. jaakko.keinanen@thl.fi.
Saana EskelinenMental Health Unit, National Institute for Health and Welfare, P.O.BOX 30, 00271, Helsinki, Finland. saana.eskelinen@hus.fi.
Outi MantereMental Health Unit, National Institute for Health and Welfare, P.O.BOX 30, 00271, Helsinki, Finland. outi.mantere@douglas.mcgill.ca.
Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People with schizophrenia have 2- to 5-fold higher risk of type 2 diabetes than the general population. The traditional risk factors for type 2 diabetes, especially obesity, poor diet, and sedentary lifestyle, are common in people with schizophrenia already early in the course of illness. People with schizophrenia also often have low socioeconomic status and income, which affects their possibilities to make healthy lifestyle choices. Antipsychotic medications increase the risk of type 2 diabetes both directly by affecting insulin sensitivity and indirectly by causing weight gain. Lifestyle modification interventions for prevention of diabetes should be an integral part of treatment of patients with schizophrenia. In the treatment of type 2 diabetes in patients with schizophrenia, communication and collaboration between medical care and psychiatric treatment providers are essential.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2SchizophreniaAnimalsBehavior TherapyHumansLife StyleObesityRisk FactorsWeight GainDiabetesPreventionRisk factorsSchizophreniaTreatment

Identifiers

PMID26803652
OpenAlexW2259012480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.