ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2016
Cardiac Rehabilitation in Patients with Established Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease: New Directions in the Era of Value-Based Healthcare.
Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02831829 (Comparative Effect of Water-based and Land-based Exercise Training on Exercise Capacity and Other Selected Cardiovascular Parameters in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparative Effect of Water-based and Land-based Exercise Training on Exercise Capacity and Other Selected Cardiovascular Parameters in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Outcomes of a smartphone-based application with live health-coaching post-percutaneous coronary intervention.EBioMedicine · 2021Trial
- Purchases of medical therapy recommended for coronary artery disease before and after elective revascularisation.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is associated with significant improvements in coronary disease outcomes, but has been underutilized. However, new developments within the field, some spurred by healthcare reform and the transition to more accountable and coordinated care, offer hope for closing the large CR treatment gap. This review presents new CR-related research, policy, and analyses, and discusses how evolving eligibility criteria, referral processes, performance measures, care models, and delivery and payment options could increase CR utilization over the next decade and enable this life-saving secondary prevention intervention to thrive in the era of value-based health care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.