Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26803503›Full record

ArticleJournal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology2016

Production of biorenewable styrene: utilization of biomass-derived sugars and insights into toxicity.

Jieni Lian, Rebekah McKenna, Marjorie R Rover, David R Nielsen, Zhiyou Wen, Laura R Jarboe

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Biomass valorization using 3D-printed catalysts.Communications chemistry · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Styrene Production in Genetically EngineeredBiotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Rational Engineering of Phenylalanine Accumulation inFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jieni LianBioeconomy Institute, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011-2230, USA.
Rebekah McKennaChemical Engineering, School for Engineering of Matter, Transport, and Energy, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Marjorie R RoverBioeconomy Institute, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011-2230, USA.
David R NielsenChemical Engineering, School for Engineering of Matter, Transport, and Energy, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Zhiyou WenDepartment of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.
Laura R JarboeDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Iowa State University, 3051 Sweeney Hall, Ames, IA, 50011-2230, USA. ljarboe@iastate.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fermentative production of styrene from glucose has been previously demonstrated in Escherichia coli. Here, we demonstrate the production of styrene from the sugars derived from lignocellulosic biomass depolymerized by fast pyrolysis. A previously engineered styrene-producing strain was further engineered for utilization of the anhydrosugar levoglucosan via expression of levoglucosan kinase. The resulting strain produced 240 ± 3 mg L(-1) styrene from pure levoglucosan, similar to the 251 ± 3 mg L(-1) produced from glucose. When provided at a concentration of 5 g L(-1), pyrolytic sugars supported styrene production at titers similar to those from pure sugars, demonstrating the feasibility of producing this important industrial chemical from biomass-derived sugars. However, the toxicity of contaminant compounds in the biomass-derived sugars and styrene itself limit further gains in production. Styrene toxicity is generally believed to be due to membrane damage. Contrary to this prevailing wisdom, our quantitative assessment during challenge with up to 200 mg L(-1) of exogenously provided styrene showed little change in membrane integrity; membrane disruption was observed only during styrene production. Membrane fluidity was also quantified during styrene production, but no changes were observed relative to the non-producing control strain. This observation that styrene production is much more damaging to the membrane integrity than challenge with exogenously supplied styrene provides insight into the mechanism of styrene toxicity and emphasizes the importance of verifying proposed toxicity mechanisms during production instead of relying upon results obtained during exogenous challenge.

Indexed as

BiomassCarbohydrate MetabolismCell MembraneEscherichia coliGlucoseLigninMembrane FluidityStyrene1,6-anhydro-beta-glucopyranoseGlucoseLigninlignocelluloseStyreneBiocatalyst inhibitionLaccaseLevoglucosan kinaseMembrane damageStyrene

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.