Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26802490›Full record

ArticleActa tropica2016

A more appropriate white blood cell count for estimating malaria parasite density in Plasmodium vivax patients in northeastern Myanmar.

Huaie Liu, Guohua Feng, Weilin Zeng, Xiaomei Li, Yao Bai, Shuang Deng, Yonghua Ruan, James Morris, Siman Li, Zhaoqing Yang and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta tropica, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase Mahidol variant protects against uncomplicated Plasmodium vivax infection and reduces disease severity in a Kachin population from northeast Myanmar.Infection, genetics and evolution : journal of molecular epidemiology and evolutionary genetics in infectious diseases · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Huaie LiuDepartment of Pathogen Biology and Immunology, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan Province, China; Department of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan Province, China.
Guohua FengBiomedical Engineering Research Center, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan Province, China.
Weilin ZengDepartment of Pathogen Biology and Immunology, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan Province, China.
Xiaomei LiDepartment of Public Health, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan Province, China.
Yao BaiDepartment of Pathogen Biology and Immunology, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan Province, China.
Shuang DengDepartment of Pathogen Biology and Immunology, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan Province, China.
Yonghua RuanDepartment of Pathology, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan Province, China.
James MorrisDepartment of Biochemistry, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan Province, China.
Siman LiEukaryotic Pathogens Innovation Center, Department of Genetics and Biochemistry, Clemson University, SC, USA.
Zhaoqing YangDepartment of Pathogen Biology and Immunology, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan Province, China. Electronic address: Zhaoqingy92@hotmail.com.
Liwang CuiDepartment of Entomology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA. Electronic address: Luc2@psu.edu.
Kunming Medical University · CNClemson University · USFirst Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University · CNPennsylvania State University · US

Funding

Southeast Asia Malaria Research CenterU19AI089672 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI CUI, LIWANG · 2010 to 2023
$28.9M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI089672NIAID NIH HHS U19AI089672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The conventional method of estimating parasite densities employ an assumption of 8000 white blood cells (WBCs)/μl. However, due to leucopenia in malaria patients, this number appears to overestimate parasite densities. In this study, we assessed the accuracy of parasite density estimated using this assumed WBC count in eastern Myanmar, where Plasmodium vivax has become increasingly prevalent. From 256 patients with uncomplicated P. vivax malaria, we estimated parasite density and counted WBCs by using an automated blood cell counter. It was found that WBC counts were not significantly different between patients of different gender, axillary temperature, and body mass index levels, whereas they were significantly different between age groups of patients and the time points of measurement. The median parasite densities calculated with the actual WBC counts (1903/μl) and the assumed WBC count of 8000/μl (2570/μl) were significantly different. We demonstrated that using the assumed WBC count of 8000 cells/μl to estimate parasite densities of P. vivax malaria patients in this area would lead to an overestimation. For P. vivax patients aged five years and older, an assumed WBC count of 5500/μl best estimated parasite densities. This study provides more realistic assumed WBC counts for estimating parasite densities in P. vivax patients from low-endemicity areas of Southeast Asia.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnimalsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantLeukocyte CountMalaria, VivaxMaleMiddle AgedMyanmarPlasmodium vivaxPrevalenceYoung AdultAgeMalaria parasiteParasite densityParasite speciesWhite blood cell count

Identifiers

PMID26802490
PMCPMC4755855
OpenAlexW2282623847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.