Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26802054›Full record

ArticleHaematologica2016

Multi-state analysis illustrates treatment success after stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia followed by donor lymphocyte infusion.

Matthias Eefting, Liesbeth C de Wreede, Constantijn J M Halkes, Peter A von dem Borne, Sabina Kersting, Erik W A Marijt, Hendrik Veelken, Hein Putter, Johannes Schetelig, J H Frederik Falkenburg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Haematologica, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Matthias EeftingDepartment of Hematology, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands.
Liesbeth C de WreedeDepartment of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands l.c.de_wreede@lumc.nl.
Constantijn J M HalkesDepartment of Hematology, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands.
Peter A von dem BorneDepartment of Hematology, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands.
Sabina KerstingDepartment of Hematology, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands.
Erik W A MarijtDepartment of Hematology, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands.
Hendrik VeelkenDepartment of Hematology, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands.
Hein PutterDepartment of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands.
Johannes ScheteligMedical Department I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden & DKMS, German Bone Marrow Donor Center, Germany.
J H Frederik FalkenburgDepartment of Hematology, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the field of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, the common approach is to focus outcome analyses on time to relapse and death, without assessing the impact of post-transplant interventions. We investigated whether a multi-state model would give insight into the events after transplantation in a cohort of patients who were transplanted using a strategy including scheduled donor lymphocyte infusions. Seventy-eight consecutive patients who underwent myeloablative T-cell depleted allogeneic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome were studied. We constructed a multi-state model to analyze the impact of donor lymphocyte infusion and graft-versus-host disease on the probabilities of relapse and non-relapse mortality over time. Based on this model we introduced a new measure for outcome after transplantation which we called 'treatment success': being alive without relapse and immunosuppression for graft-versus-host disease. All relevant clinical events were implemented into the multi-state model and were denoted treatment success or failure (either transient or permanent). Both relapse and non-relapse mortality were causes of failure of comparable magnitude. Whereas relapse was the dominant cause of failure from the transplantation state, its rate was reduced after graft-versus-host disease, and especially after donor lymphocyte infusion. The long-term probability of treatment success was approximately 40%. This probability was increased after donor lymphocyte infusion. Our multi-state model helps to interpret the impact of post-transplantation interventions and clinical events on failure and treatment success, thus extracting more information from observational data.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationLymphocyte TransfusionModels, StatisticalAdolescentAdultFemaleGraft vs Host DiseaseHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteLymphocyte DepletionMaleMiddle AgedMyeloablative AgonistsMyelodysplastic SyndromesRecurrenceSiblingsMyeloablative Agonists

Identifiers

PMID26802054
PMCPMC5004390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.