Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26801759›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2016

The Active for Life Year 5 (AFLY5) school-based cluster randomised controlled trial: effect on potential mediators.

Debbie A Lawlor, Laura D Howe, Emma L Anderson, Ruth R Kipping, Rona Campbell, Sian Wells, Catherine R Chittleborough, Tim J Peters, Russell Jago

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Interventions to prevent obesity in children aged 5 to 11 years old.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. A developmental cascade perspective of paediatric obesity: A systematic review of preventive interventions from infancy through late adolescence.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2020
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Debbie A LawlorSchool of Social & Community Medicine, University of Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK. d.a.lawlor@bristol.ac.uk.
Laura D HoweSchool of Social & Community Medicine, University of Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
Emma L AndersonSchool of Social & Community Medicine, University of Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
Ruth R KippingSchool of Social & Community Medicine, University of Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
Rona CampbellSchool of Social & Community Medicine, University of Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
Sian WellsSchool of Social & Community Medicine, University of Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
Catherine R ChittleboroughSchool of Public Health, University of Adelaide, 178 North Terrace, Adelaide, 5005, South Australia.
Tim J PetersSchool of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, 69 St Michael's Hill, Bristol, BS2 8DZ, UK.
Russell JagoCentre for Exercise, Nutrition & Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, 8 Priory Road, Bristol, BS8 1TZ, UK.

Funding

British Heart FoundationCancer Research UKDepartment of Health 09/3005/04Medical Research Council G1002375Medical Research Council MC_UU_12013/5Medical Research Council MR/K023233/1Medical Research Council MR/K025643/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundActive for life year 5 (AFLY5) is a school-based intervention, based on social cognitive theory, which aims to promote healthy levels of physical activity and healthy eating by improving a child's self-efficacy to make healthy choices, their knowledge of how to make such choices and prompting parents to support their children to make healthy choices. Previously published results showed no effect on the three primary outcomes and beneficial effects on three of nine secondary outcomes (time spent screen-viewing at weekends, consumption of snacks and of high energy drinks). This paper aims to determine the effect of the intervention on potential mediators.

methodsWe conducted a cluster RCT of a school-based intervention, with allocation concealed by use of a remote system. The study was undertaken in the South West of England between 2011 and 2013. Participants were school children who were age 8-9 years at baseline assessment and 9-10 years during the intervention. Potential mediators were assessed at the end of the intervention. The intervention consisted of teacher training, provision of all materials required for lessons and homeworks and written materials for school newsletters and parents. The ten potential mediators were child-reported self-efficacy for physical activity and fruit and vegetable consumption, perceived parental logistic support and modelling for their child's physical activity, parental efforts to limit their child's sedentary behaviour and modelling of healthy fruit and vegetable consumption, together with a knowledge assessment.

resultsWe successfully recruited 60 schools with over 2,221 children; valid data for the 10 mediators were available for 87 % to 96 % of participants. Three of the ten potential mediators were greater in the intervention, compared with the control group: fruit and vegetable self-efficacy 2.2 units (95 % CI: 0.7 to 3.8), assessed on a scale 26 to 130; child-reported maternal limitation of sedentary behaviour 0.5 (0.1 to 0.8), scale 4 to 16; and knowledge 0.5 (0.2, 0.7) scale 0 to 9. Reported maternal limitation of sedentary behaviour and the child's knowledge explained 23 % of the effect of the intervention on reducing time spent on sedentary behaviour at the weekend. There was no effect on other mediators.

conclusionsOur findings suggest that the effect of the AFLY5 intervention on reducing screen-viewing at weekends was partially mediated by an effect on mothers limiting their child's time spent sedentary and on increasing the child's knowledge about healthy behaviour. However, overall our findings suggest that theory driven interventions, like AFLY5, can fail to influence most potential mediators and this may explain the failure of the intervention to improve most primary and secondary outcomes.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN50133740. Registered 17/03/2011.

Indexed as

DietExerciseHealth BehaviorChildEnglandFemaleFruitHealth PromotionHumansInservice TrainingLife StyleMaleParentsSchoolsSelf ReportVegetables

Identifiers

PMID26801759
PMCPMC4724071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.