ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2016
[Rectal neuroendocrine tumors: endoscopic therapy].
Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endoscopic submucosal dissection and hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection for stage 1 rectal neuroendocrine tumors.World journal of clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Comparing surgical and endoscopic resection approaches for colorectal neuroendocrine tumors within the diameter range of 10-20mm: an inverse probability weighting analysis based on the SEER database.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
- Rectal neuroendocrine tumors: Current advances in management, treatment, and surveillance.World journal of gastroenterology · 2022Review
- Prognosis of rectal neuroendocrine tumors after endoscopic resection: a single-center retrospective study.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2021Article
- Relevant risk factors and the prognostic impact of positive resection margins after endoscopic resection of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinically detected neuroendocrine neoplasms of the rectum have increased 10- to 30-fold in frequency over the past 45 years in Germany. Endoscopic ultrasonography is the method of choice for exact determination of the size of the tumor, depth of infiltration and detection of local lymph node metastases. Well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors ≤ 10.0 mm in size that do not infiltrate the muscularis propria can be endoscopically resected. In the case of lymphatic or blood vessel invasion or spread to lymph nodes, surgical lymph node dissection is indicated. The management of well-differentiated, neuroendocrine rectal tumors 10.1-20 mm in size is still a matter of debate. Old age and multimorbidity favor a conservative endoscopic approach; however, in the case of fit young patients, surgical management has to be considered. For neuroendocrine rectal neoplasms ≥ 20 mm in size, the risk of metastatic spread increases to 60-80 % indicating that an endoscopic resection is not adequate. Due to the introduction of screening colonoscopy, neuroendocrine rectal tumors are nowadays diagnosed mostly at a prognostically favorable early stage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.