ArticleJournal of medical ultrasonics (2001)2016
Impact of parametric imaging on contrast-enhanced ultrasound of breast cancer.
Article in Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Arrival-Time Parametric Imaging in Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Thyroid Nodule Differentiation.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024Article
- Enhanced Diagnostic Imaging: Arrival-Time Parametric Imaging in Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Multi-Organ Assessment.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024Review
- Quantification of dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in non-cystic breast lesions using external perfusion software.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Comparison of tumor angiogenesis in subcutaneous and orthotopic LNCaP mouse models using contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging.Translational cancer research · 2021Article
- Interpretation of cardiac wall motion from cine-MRI combined with parametric imaging based on the Hilbert transform.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo prospectively evaluate the usefulness of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) using parametric imaging for breast cancer in a multicenter study.
methodsA total of 65 patients with breast cancer were included in this study. CEUS was performed, and still images on peak time (S), accumulated images (A) and parametric images (P) were generated from the raw data. Four blind reviewers ranked the best visible images as first place, and determined second and third place consecutively. We compared the average ranking of each image. The maximal diameter of the tumor determined on ultrasonography and MRI was compared with the corresponding pathological maximal diameter for 48 of the 65 patients. The correlation between the diameter determined by two experts and two beginners was analyzed.
resultsThe average rank of visibility was as follows: P, 1.44; A, 2.04; and S, 2.52. The correlation between each image and the pathology was as follows: P, r = 0.664; A, r = 0.630; S, r = 0.717; and MRI, r = 0.936. There were no significant differences among the correlation between the experts and beginners in each image.
conclusionsThe use of parametric imaging improves the visibility of CEUS. The maximal diameter of the tumor determined on CEUS correlates substantially with the pathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26801662What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.