SynthesisBMC geriatrics2016
Effectiveness of interventions to directly support food and drink intake in people with dementia: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC geriatrics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
70 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 186 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimizing mealtime care and outcomes for people with dementia and their caregivers: A systematic review and meta-analysis of intervention studies.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Pooled it
- Do nutritional interventions before or during pregnancy affect placental phenotype? Findings from a systematic review of human clinical trials.Journal of global health · 2024Pooled it
- How do we provide good mealtime care for people with dementia living in care homes? A systematic review of carer-resident interactions.Dementia (London, England) · 2021Pooled it
- Interventions to Improve Hydration in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Nutrients · 2021Pooled it
- Nutritional supplements for neuropsychiatric symptoms in people with dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of geriatric psychiatry · 2020Pooled it
- Community-based supplementary feeding for food insecure, vulnerable and malnourished populations - an overview of systematic reviews.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Environmental and behavioural modifications for improving food and fluid intake in people with dementia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Effectiveness of interventions to indirectly support food and drink intake in people with dementia: Eating and Drinking Well IN dementiA (EDWINA) systematic review.BMC geriatrics · 2016Pooled it
- The Effect of Food Odor Exposure on Appetite and Nutritional Intake of Older Adults with Dementia.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2022Trial
- Trial
- Effects of Hand Exercise on Eating Action in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease.American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias · 2019Trial
- A comprehensive intervention following the clinical pathway of eating and swallowing disorder in the elderly with dementia: historically controlled study.BMC geriatrics · 2017Trial
- [Oropharyngeal dysphagia as a neurogeriatric syndrome].Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2026Review
- Review
- Methods of Engaging Interest-Holders in Healthcare Evidence Syntheses: A Scoping Review.Cochrane evidence synthesis and methods · 2026Review
- Feasibility of a nurse-led online video intervention for mealtime assistance in dementia care: a quasi-experimental mixed-methods study.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Endothelial function can be modulated by acute hyperglycemia.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Promoting Mealtime Independence and Mealtime Experience for Individuals With Dementia: A Study Protocol.Nursing open · 2025Article
- The Influence of a Dementia Diagnosis on Clinical Decision-Making in Dysphagia Management.International journal of geriatric psychiatry · 2025Article
10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEating and drinking difficulties are recognised sources of ill health in people with dementia. In the EDWINA (Eating and Drinking Well IN dementiA) systematic review we aimed to assess effectiveness of interventions to directly improve, maintain or facilitate oral food and drink intake, nutrition and hydration status, in people with cognitive impairment or dementia (across all settings, levels of care and support, types and degrees of dementia). Interventions included oral nutrition supplementation, food modification, dysphagia management, eating assistance and supporting the social element of eating and drinking.
methodsWe comprehensively searched 13 databases for relevant intervention studies. The review was conducted with service user input in accordance with Cochrane Collaboration's guidelines. We duplicated assessment of inclusion, data extraction, and validity assessment, tabulating data, carrying out random effects meta-analysis and narrative synthesis.
resultsForty-three controlled interventions were included, disappointingly none were judged at low risk of bias. Oral nutritional supplementation studies suggested small positive short term but unclear long term effects on nutritional status. Food modification or dysphagia management studies were smaller and of low quality, providing little evidence of an improved nutritional status. Eating assistance studies provided inconsistent evidence, but studies with a strong social element around eating/drinking, although small and of low quality provided consistent suggestion of improvements in aspects of quality of life. There were few data to address stakeholders' questions.
conclusionsWe found no definitive evidence on effectiveness, or lack of effectiveness, of specific interventions but studies were small and short term. People with cognitive impairment and their carers have to tackle eating problems despite this lack of evidence, so promising interventions are listed. The need remains for high quality trials tailored for people with cognitive impairment assessing robust outcomes. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: The systematic review protocol was registered (CRD42014007611) and is published, with the full MEDLINE search strategy, on Prospero.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.