Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26801480›Full record

SynthesisNeuroradiology2016

Flow diverter treatment of posterior circulation aneurysms. A meta-analysis.

Cheng-Bin Wang, Wen-Wen Shi, Guang-Xu Zhang, Hu-Chen Lu, Jun Ma

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neuroradiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Endovascular treatment outcomes of vertebrobasilar junction aneurysms: Systematic review and meta-analysis.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Safety and efficacy profile of off-label use of the Pipeline Embolization Device: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Efficacy and safety of flow diverters in posterior circulation aneurysms and comparison with their efficacy in anterior circulation aneurysms: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2021
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Early clinical experience with the new generation Pipeline Vantage flow diverter in the treatment of unruptured saccular aneurysms using short-term dual antiplatelet therapy.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Quantitative magnetic resonance angiography for early identification of in-stent stenosis post-flow diverter aneurysm embolization.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Indirect flow diversion for the treatment of saccular posterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysms: An 11-year single-center retrospective study.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Cheng-Bin WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nanjing Brain Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, No. 264, Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210000, China.
Wen-Wen ShiSchool of Inspection and Life Science, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Guang-Xu ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nanjing Brain Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, No. 264, Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210000, China.
Hu-Chen LuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nanjing Brain Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, No. 264, Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210000, China.
Jun MaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nanjing Brain Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, No. 264, Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210000, China. 15150657187@163.com.
Nanjing Medical University · CNNanjing Brain Hospital · CNWenzhou Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTreatment of complex anterior circulation aneurysms with flow diverters (FDs) has become common practice in neurovascular centers. However, this treatment method for posterior circulation aneurysms (PCAs) still remains controversial.

methodsThrough searches for reports on the treatment of PCAs with FDs, we conducted a systematic review of the literature on its clinical efficacy and safety using random-effect binomial meta-analysis.

resultsWe included 14 studies, which reported on a total of 225 PCAs in 220 patients. Procedure-related good outcome rate was 79% (95% confidence interval (CI), 72-84), with significantly lower odds among patients with ruptured aneurysms and basilar artery aneurysms. Procedure-related mortality rate was 15% (95% CI 10-21), with significantly higher rates among patients with giant aneurysms and basilar artery aneurysms. The rate of complete aneurysm occlusion at 6-month digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was 84%. Ischemic stroke rate was 11%. Perforator infarction rate was 7%. Postoperative subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) rate was 3%. Intraparenchymal hemorrhage (IPH) rate was 4%.

conclusionsFlow diverter treatment of PCAs is an effective method, which provides a high rate of complete occlusion at 6-month DSA. However, compared with anterior circulation aneurysms, patients with PCAs are at significantly higher risk of mortality, ischemic stroke and perforator infarction. Our findings indicate that, in most clinical centers, flow diverter treatment of PCAs should be conducted in carefully selected patients with poor natural history and no optimal treatment strategy. For ruptured and giant basilar artery aneurysms, there is still no good treatment option.

Indexed as

Blood Vessel ProsthesisEndovascular ProceduresStentsHumansIntracranial AneurysmEndovascular treatmentFlow divertersInterventional neuroradiologyPosterior circulation aneurysms

Identifiers

PMID26801480
PMCPMC4819826
OpenAlexW2266955292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.