Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26801468›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2016

Tablet computers for implementing NICE antenatal mental health guidelines: protocol of a feasibility study.

José S Marcano-Belisario, Ajay K Gupta, John O'Donoghue, Cecily Morrison, Josip Car

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02516982 (Tablet Computers for Implementing NICE Antenatal Mental Health Guidelines - Feasibility Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02516982 completednot on this map

Tablet Computers for Implementing NICE Antenatal Mental Health Guidelines - Feasibility Study

TypeobservationalSponsorImperial College LondonRan2015 to 2018Enrolled946ConditionsDepression, PregnancyArmsWhooley Questions, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, Momentary questions, Contextual questions
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

José S Marcano-BelisarioGlobal eHealth Unit, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Ajay K GuptaNational Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
John O'DonoghueGlobal eHealth Unit, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Cecily MorrisonGlobal eHealth Unit, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Josip CarGlobal eHealth Unit, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Imperial College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDepression is one of the most common mental health disorders that may affect women during pregnancy. The prompt identification of this disorder, and the provision of treatment, may help to reduce the likelihood of post-partum depression, prevent severe forms of the disease, and reduce its intergenerational impact. Despite women's repeated encounters with health services throughout their antenatal care, depression often goes undiagnosed. This is one area where mobile health could prove useful. We will assess the feasibility of using tablets to incorporate depression screening into antenatal pathways. We will also assess if survey layout could affect the quality of the data collected through these devices. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will test the feasibility of using iPad Airs for the administration of the Whooley questions and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) to pregnant women attending antenatal clinics in England. We will assess the impact of survey layout on the quality of the responses given to these screening scales using a parallel, randomised controlled study design. We will calculate the positive predictive value, the negative predictive value and the false omission rate of the Whooley questions in comparison with the EPDS. We will calculate differences in data equivalence, time needed to complete the surveys, break-off rates, data completeness and requests for help between the 2 experimental groups: using all questions in one screen and navigation by vertical scrolling, or a single question per screen and navigation by multiple pages. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the National Research Ethics Service Committee South East Coast--Surrey. Our findings will be disseminated through academic peer-reviewed publications, conferences and discussion with peers.

Indexed as

Computers, HandheldDepressionEnglandFeasibility StudiesFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansMental HealthPractice Guidelines as TopicPredictive Value of TestsPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPrenatal CareMENTAL HEALTHPUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID26801468
PMCPMC4735209
OpenAlexW2267400326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.