Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26801397›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2016

SeqTools: visual tools for manual analysis of sequence alignments.

Gemma Barson, Ed Griffiths

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Journal of bacteriology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Large Differences in the HaptophyteFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gemma BarsonWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK. gb10@sanger.ac.uk.
Ed GriffithsWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK. edgrif@sanger.ac.uk.

Funding

NHGRI NIH HHS 5U54HG00455-04Wellcome Trust 098051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundManual annotation is essential to create high-quality reference alignments and annotation. Annotators need to be able to view sequence alignments in detail. The SeqTools package provides three tools for viewing different types of sequence alignment: Blixem is a many-to-one browser of pairwise alignments, displaying multiple match sequences aligned against a single reference sequence; Dotter provides a graphical dot-plot view of a single pairwise alignment; and Belvu is a multiple sequence alignment viewer, editor, and phylogenetic tool. These tools were originally part of the AceDB genome database system but have been completely rewritten to make them generally available as a standalone package of greatly improved function.

findingsBlixem is used by annotators to give a detailed view of the evidence for particular gene models. Blixem displays the gene model positions and the match sequences aligned against the genomic reference sequence. Annotators use this for many reasons, including to check the quality of an alignment, to find missing/misaligned sequence and to identify splice sites and polyA sites and signals. Dotter is used to give a dot-plot representation of a particular pairwise alignment. This is used to identify sequence that is not represented (or is misrepresented) and to quickly compare annotated gene models with transcriptional and protein evidence that putatively supports them. Belvu is used to analyse conservation patterns in multiple sequence alignments and to perform a combination of manual and automatic processing of the alignment. High-quality reference alignments are essential if they are to be used as a starting point for further automatic alignment generation.

conclusionsWhile there are many different alignment tools available, the SeqTools package provides unique functionality that annotators have found to be essential for analysing sequence alignments as part of the manual annotation process.

Indexed as

Computer GraphicsGenomeSoftwareAlgorithmsAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsBase SequenceDatabases, GeneticGene OntologyGenomicsHumansMolecular Sequence AnnotationMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenySequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID26801397
PMCPMC4724122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.