Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26801360›Full record

ArticlePlant biotechnology journal2016

BioNano genome mapping of individual chromosomes supports physical mapping and sequence assembly in complex plant genomes.

Helena Staňková, Alex R Hastie, Saki Chan, Jan Vrána, Zuzana Tulpová, Marie Kubaláková, Paul Visendi, Satomi Hayashi, Mingcheng Luo, Jacqueline Batley and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant biotechnology journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Flow Cytometric Analysis and Sorting of Plant Chromosomes.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  8. Flow Sorting-Assisted Optical Mapping.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Flow karyotyping of wheat-Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Advances in optical mapping for genomic research.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Helena StaňkováInstitute of Experimental Botany, Centre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Alex R HastieBioNano Genomics, San Diego, CA, USA.
Saki ChanBioNano Genomics, San Diego, CA, USA.
Jan VránaInstitute of Experimental Botany, Centre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Zuzana TulpováInstitute of Experimental Botany, Centre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Marie KubalákováInstitute of Experimental Botany, Centre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Paul VisendiAustralian Centre for Plant Functional Genomics, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Satomi HayashiSchool of Agriculture and Food Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Mingcheng LuoDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Jacqueline BatleySchool of Agriculture and Food Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
David EdwardsSchool of Plant Biology, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.
Jaroslav DoleželInstitute of Experimental Botany, Centre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Hana ŠimkováInstitute of Experimental Botany, Centre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Olomouc, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The assembly of a reference genome sequence of bread wheat is challenging due to its specific features such as the genome size of 17 Gbp, polyploid nature and prevalence of repetitive sequences. BAC-by-BAC sequencing based on chromosomal physical maps, adopted by the International Wheat Genome Sequencing Consortium as the key strategy, reduces problems caused by the genome complexity and polyploidy, but the repeat content still hampers the sequence assembly. Availability of a high-resolution genomic map to guide sequence scaffolding and validate physical map and sequence assemblies would be highly beneficial to obtaining an accurate and complete genome sequence. Here, we chose the short arm of chromosome 7D (7DS) as a model to demonstrate for the first time that it is possible to couple chromosome flow sorting with genome mapping in nanochannel arrays and create a de novo genome map of a wheat chromosome. We constructed a high-resolution chromosome map composed of 371 contigs with an N50 of 1.3 Mb. Long DNA molecules achieved by our approach facilitated chromosome-scale analysis of repetitive sequences and revealed a ~800-kb array of tandem repeats intractable to current DNA sequencing technologies. Anchoring 7DS sequence assemblies obtained by clone-by-clone sequencing to the 7DS genome map provided a valuable tool to improve the BAC-contig physical map and validate sequence assembly on a chromosome-arm scale. Our results indicate that creating genome maps for the whole wheat genome in a chromosome-by-chromosome manner is feasible and that they will be an affordable tool to support the production of improved pseudomolecules.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantBiotechnologyChromosome MappingChromosomes, Artificial, BacterialChromosomes, PlantSequence Analysis, DNATandem Repeat SequencesTriticumchromosomesflow sortingoptical mappingphysical mapsequencingwheat

Identifiers

PMID26801360
PMCPMC5066648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.