Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26801356›Full record

SynthesisThe British journal of dermatology2016

Interventions for hidradenitis suppurativa: a Cochrane systematic review incorporating GRADE assessment of evidence quality.

J R Ingram, P N Woo, S L Chua, A D Ormerod, N Desai, A C Kai, K Hood, T Burton, F Kerdel, S E Garner and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The British journal of dermatology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
13.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Management of penoscrotal hidradenitis: a narrative review.International journal of impotence research · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Surgical Management of Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Narrative Review.The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. [Impact of LAight therapy on hidradenitis suppurativa care].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. TNF-α inhibitors in the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa.Therapeutic advances in chronic disease · 2019
    Review
  19. Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Causes, Features, and Current Treatments.The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2018
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.

J R IngramInstitute of Infection & Immunity, Cardiff University, Cardiff, U.K.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5257-1142
P N WooDepartment of Dermatology, Northampton General Hospital NHS Trust, Northampton, U.K.
S L ChuaDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, U.K.
A D OrmerodDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, U.K.
N DesaiSt John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, U.K.
A C KaiSt John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, U.K.
K HoodCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, U.K.
T BurtonThe Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS) Trust, Chatham, U.K.
F KerdelFlorida Academic Dermatology Center, Larkin Community Hospital, South Miami, FL, U.S.A.
S E GarnerScience Policy and Research, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), London, U.K.
V PiguetInstitute of Infection & Immunity, Cardiff University, Cardiff, U.K.
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBInstitute of Infection and Immunity · CACardiff University · GBHidradenitis Suppurativa Foundation · USLarkin Community Hospital · USNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence · GBNorthampton General Hospital NHS Trust · GBUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Aberdeen · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

More than 50 interventions have been used to treat hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), and so therapy decisions can be challenging. Our objective was to summarize and appraise randomized controlled trial (RCT) evidence for HS interventions in adults. Searches were conducted in Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, LILACS, five trials registers and abstracts from eight dermatology conferences until 13 August 2015. Two review authors independently assessed study eligibility, extracted data and assessed methodological quality. Primary outcomes were quality of life and adverse effects of the interventions. Twelve trials, from 1983 to 2015, investigating 15 different interventions met our inclusion criteria. The median trial duration was 16 weeks and the median number of participants was 27. Adalimumab 40 mg weekly improved the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) by 4·0 points, which equates to the minimal clinically important difference for the scale, compared with placebo (95% confidence interval -6·5 to -1·5 points). Evidence quality was reduced to 'moderate' because the results are based on only a single study. Adalimumab 40 mg every other week was ineffective in a meta-analysis of two studies comprising 124 participants. Infliximab 5 mg kg(-1) improved the DLQI score by 8·4 points after 8 weeks in a moderate-quality study completed by 33 of 38 participants. Etanercept 50 mg twice weekly was ineffective. Inclusion of a gentamicin sponge prior to primary closure did not improve outcomes. Other interventions, including topical and oral antibiotics, were investigated by relatively small studies, preventing treatment recommendations due to imprecision. More, larger RCTs are required to investigate most HS interventions, particularly oral treatments and surgical therapy. Moderate-quality evidence suggests that adalimumab given weekly and infliximab are effective, whereas adalimumab every other week is ineffective.

Indexed as

AdalimumabAdministration, OralAdultAndrogen AntagonistsAnti-Bacterial AgentsClindamycinCyproterone AcetateDermatologic AgentsEtanerceptEthinyl EstradiolGentamicinsHidradenitis SuppurativaHumansInfliximabNorgestrelQuality of LifeAdalimumabAndrogen AntagonistsAnti-Bacterial AgentsClindamycinCyproterone AcetateDermatologic AgentsEtanerceptEthinyl EstradiolGentamicinsInfliximabNorgestrel

Identifiers

PMID26801356
PMCPMC5021164
OpenAlexW2252504338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.