Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26801070›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2016

Clinical Validation and Implementation of a Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Assay to Detect Somatic Variants in Non-Small Cell Lung, Melanoma, and Gastrointestinal Malignancies.

Kevin E Fisher, Linsheng Zhang, Jason Wang, Geoffrey H Smith, Scott Newman, Thomas M Schneider, Rathi N Pillai, Ragini R Kudchadkar, Taofeek K Owonikoko, Suresh S Ramalingam and 15 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Next-generation sequencing in dermatology.Frontiers in medicine · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Prognostic Biomarkers in Melanoma: Tailoring Treatments to the Patient.The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Preparation of the standard cell lines for reference mutations in cancer gene-panels by genome editing in HEK 293 T/17 cells.Genes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kevin E FisherDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia; Department of Pathology, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas; Department of Pathology and Immunology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas. Electronic address: kevin.fisher@bcm.edu.
Linsheng ZhangDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Jason WangDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia; Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern and Children's Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Geoffrey H SmithDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Scott NewmanBiostatistics and Bioinformatics Shared Resource, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Thomas M SchneiderDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Rathi N PillaiDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia; Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Ragini R KudchadkarDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia; Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Taofeek K OwonikokoDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia; Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Suresh S RamalingamDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia; Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
David H LawsonDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia; Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Keith A DelmanWinship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia; Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Bassel F El-RayesDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia; Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Malania M WilsonWinship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
H Clifford SullivanDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Annie S MorrisonDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Serdar BalciDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
N Volkan AdsayDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Anthony A GalDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Gabriel L SicaDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Debra F SaxeDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Karen P MannDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Charles E HillDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Fadlo R KhuriDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia; Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Michael R RossiDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia; Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Emory University · US

Funding

Winship Cancer Institute Cancer Center Support GrantP30CA138292 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Suresh S Ramalingam · 2009 to 2026
$47.5M
Training Grant in Transfusion Medicine (T32)T32HL069769 · NHLBI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Una T O'Doherty, John D Roback · 2004 to 2026
$2.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA138292NCI NIH HHS P30CA138292NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL069769
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We tested and clinically validated a targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) mutation panel using 80 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor samples. Forty non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), 30 melanoma, and 30 gastrointestinal (12 colonic, 10 gastric, and 8 pancreatic adenocarcinoma) FFPE samples were selected from laboratory archives. After appropriate specimen and nucleic acid quality control, 80 NGS libraries were prepared using the Illumina TruSight tumor (TST) kit and sequenced on the Illumina MiSeq. Sequence alignment, variant calling, and sequencing quality control were performed using vendor software and laboratory-developed analysis workflows. TST generated ≥500× coverage for 98.4% of the 13,952 targeted bases. Reproducible and accurate variant calling was achieved at ≥5% variant allele frequency with 8 to 12 multiplexed samples per MiSeq flow cell. TST detected 112 variants overall, and confirmed all known single-nucleotide variants (n = 27), deletions (n = 5), insertions (n = 3), and multinucleotide variants (n = 3). TST detected at least one variant in 85.0% (68/80), and two or more variants in 36.2% (29/80), of samples. TP53 was the most frequently mutated gene in NSCLC (13 variants; 13/32 samples), gastrointestinal malignancies (15 variants; 13/25 samples), and overall (30 variants; 28/80 samples). BRAF mutations were most common in melanoma (nine variants; 9/23 samples). Clinically relevant NGS data can be obtained from routine clinical FFPE solid tumor specimens using TST, benchtop instruments, and vendor-supplied bioinformatics pipelines.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesErbB ReceptorsGastrointestinal NeoplasmsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceLimit of DetectionLung NeoplasmsMelanomaMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionMutationParaffin EmbeddingQuality ControlSensitivity and SpecificityTumor Suppressor Protein p53EGFR protein, humanERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesErbB ReceptorsTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID26801070
PMCPMC4816706
OpenAlexW2284864563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.