Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26800692›Full record

ArticleJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2016

Elastomeric enriched biodegradable polyurethane sponges for critical bone defects: a successful case study reducing donor site morbidity.

Catarina Lavrador, Ramiro Mascarenhas, Paulo Coelho, Cláudia Brites, Alfredo Pereira, Sylwester Gogolewski

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Biomimetic Polyurethanes in Tissue Engineering.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Catarina LavradorInstitute of Mediterranean Agricultural and Environmental Science (ICAAM); School of Science and Technology (ECT), University of Évora, Évora, Portugal. clavrador@uevora.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2927-9071
Ramiro MascarenhasInstitute of National Agricultural and Veterinary Research (INIAV), Av. da República, Quinta do Marquês, 2780-157, Oeiras, Portugal.
Paulo CoelhoFaculty of Dental Medicine, University of Lisbon, Av. Prof. Gama Pinto, 1649-003, Lisbon, Portugal.
Cláudia BritesLaboratório de Tecidos Duros - Area of Dental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Av. Bissaya Barreto, Blocos de Celas, 3000-075, Coimbra, Portugal.
Alfredo PereiraInstitute of Mediterranean Agricultural and Environmental Science (ICAAM); School of Science and Technology (ECT), University of Évora, Évora, Portugal.
Sylwester GogolewskiPolyBiomat Consulting, Zielona Gora, Poland.
University of Évora · PTInstituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária · PTUniversity of Coimbra · PTUniversity of Lisbon · PTUniversity of Zielona Góra · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone substitutes have been a critical issue as the natural source can seldom provide enough bone to support full healing. No bone substitute complies with all necessary functions and characteristics that an autograft does. Polyurethane sponges have been used as a surgical alternative to cancellous bone grafts for critical bone defect donor sites. Critical bone defects were created on the tibial tuberosity and iliac crest using an ovine model. In group I (control-untreated), no bone regeneration was observed in any animal. In group II (defects left empty but covered with a microporous polymeric membrane), the new bone bridged the top ends in all animals. In groups III and IV, bone defects were implanted with polyurethane scaffolds modified with biologically active compounds, and bone regeneration was more efficient than in group II. In groups III and IV there were higher values of bone regeneration specific parameters used for evaluation (P < 0.05) although the comparison between these groups was not possible. The results obtained in this study suggest that biodegradable polyurethane substitutes modified with biologically active substances may offer an alternative to bone graft, reducing donor site morbidity associated with autogenous cancellous bone harvesting.

Indexed as

Absorbable ImplantsBone RegenerationBone SubstitutesAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsDiaphysesElastomersFemaleFracture HealingIliumMaterials TestingPolyurethanesSheepTibial FracturesBiocompatible MaterialsBone SubstitutesElastomersPolyurethanes

Identifiers

PMID26800692
OpenAlexW2336841909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.