Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26800688›Full record

ReviewPsychopharmacology2016

Conditioned stimuli's role in relapse: preclinical research on Pavlovian-Instrumental-Transfer.

R J Lamb, Charles W Schindler, Jonathan W Pinkston

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Psychopharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Habit, choice, and addiction.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Cues play a critical role in estrous cycle-dependent enhancement of cocaine reinforcement.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

R J LambDepartments of Psychiatry & Pharmacology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX, 78229-3900, USA. lamb@uthscsa.edu.
Charles W SchindlerPreclinical Pharmacology Section, Behavioral Neuroscience Research Branch, Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, 251 Bayview Blvd, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA.
Jonathan W PinkstonDepartment of Behavioral Analysis, University of North Texas, 360 G Chilton Hall, Avenue C, Denton, TX, 76208, USA.
National Institute on Drug Abuse · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USUniversity of North Texas · US

Funding

Control Of Behavior By Drug InjectionsZIADA000001 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI SHAHAM, YAVIN · 2009 to 2016
$8.3M
Rat ethanol self-administration: respondent instrumental interactionsR01AA012337 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI LAMB, RICHARD J · 2001 to 2016
$3.4M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA012337
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RATIONALE AND

objectivePavlovian learning is central to many theories of addiction. In these theories, stimuli paired with drug ingestion become conditioned stimuli (CS) and subsequently elicit drug-seeking and drug-taking. However, in most relevant studies, Pavlovian and instrumental learning are confounded. This confound may be avoided in Pavlovian-Instrumental-Transfer (PIT) procedures. In PIT, Pavlovian and instrumental learning are established separately and then combined. In order to better understand the role of CSs in addiction, we review the relevant studies using PIT.

findingsWe identified seven articles examining PIT effects of ethanol- or cocaine-paired CSs. Under at least one condition, six of these articles reported CS-elicited increases in responding previously maintained by drug. However, the only study using the optimal control condition failed to find a CS-elicited increase. Two studies examining CS specificity found the CS also increased responding maintained by a different reinforcer. Two studies examined if CSs elicit increases in actual drug-taking. Both failed to find CS-elicited increases, i.e., no study shows CS-elicited increases in actual drug-taking. Further, CS-elicited increases in extinguished responding are short-lived.

conclusionsThese findings are not entirely consistent with Pavlovian learning playing a central role in addiction. However, design issues can explain most of these inconsistencies. Studies without these design issues are needed. Additionally, existing theories hypothesize drug-paired CSs increase drug-taking by increasing motivation, by eliciting conditioned responses that make drug-seeking more probable, or by a combination of these. Work distinguishing between these mechanisms would also be useful.

Indexed as

Conditioning, ClassicalConditioning, OperantTransfer, PsychologyAnimalsBehavior, AddictiveHumansModels, PsychologicalMotivationRecurrenceAlcoholismconditioned approachconditioned reinforcementConditioned Responsediscriminative stimulusGoal-Trackingincentive salienceMotivationself-administrationSign-Tracking

Identifiers

PMID26800688
PMCPMC4863941
OpenAlexW2281722945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.