ArticleThe British journal of radiology2016
Interobserver agreement of multicompartment ultrasound in the assessment of pelvic floor anatomy.
Article in The British journal of radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of Functional Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Pelvic Floor Muscle Training on Cerebral Hemodynamics and Brain Functional Connectivity in Women with Postpartum Pelvic Floor Dysfunction: A Randomized Controlled Trial.International journal of women's health · 2025Article
- Interobserver variability of ultrasound measurements for the differential diagnosis of uterine prolapse and cervical elongation without uterine prolapse.International urogynecology journal · 2022Observational
- Point of care ultrasound in pelvic health: scope of practice, education and governance for physiotherapists.International urogynecology journal · 2022Article
- Fibromatosis involving pelvic floor muscles.BJR case reports · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the interobserver agreement of pelvic floor anatomical measurements using multicompartment pelvic floor ultrasound.
methodsFemales were recruited from the urogynaecology/gynaecology clinics between July and October 2009 and underwent multicompartment pelvic floor ultrasonography (PFUS) using two-dimensional (2D) transperineal ultrasound (TPUS), high-frequency 2D/three-dimensional (3D) endovaginal ultrasound (EVUS) using a biplane probe with linear and transverse arrays and a 360° rotational 3D-EVUS. PFUS measurements were independently analysed by two clinicians.
results158 females had PFUS assessment. Good-to-excellent interobserver agreement was observed for bladder-symphysis distance at rest and valsalva, urethral thickness, urethral length, urethral volume, levator hiatus area and width, anteroposterior diameter and anorectal angle. Lins Correlation was used to calculate the interobserver agreement and Bland-Altman plots were created to demonstrate the agreement between the researchers. There was also a good-to-excellent agreement between the two clinicians for the assessment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in the anterior, middle and posterior compartment.
conclusionMulticompartment PFUS is a reliable tool in the anatomical assessment of pelvic floor measurements and POP. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: We found a good-to-excellent agreement between the two assessors in the assessment of pelvic floor measurements for all three pelvic floor compartments and suggest that multicompartment PFUS could be considered as a systematic integrated approach to assess the pelvic floor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.