ArticleHealth services research2016
The Effect of the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations on Mammography Rates.
Article in Health services research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Individual-Level Trends in Mammography Screening over 14 years: Results from an All-Payer Statewide Claims Database.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026Article
- Rural-urban disparities in breast cancer incidence among US women aged 20-49: trends by race/ethnicity, stage, poverty, and state from 2000-2019.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2026Article
- Socioeconomic and Geographic Differences in Mammography Trends Following the 2009 USPSTF Policy Update.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Long-term Mammography Screening Trends and Predictors of Return to Screening after the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results from a Statewide Registry.Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2024Article
- Utilization and cost sharing for preventive cancer screenings.Health policy OPEN · 2021Article
- Examining Breast Cancer Screening Behavior Among Southern Black Women After the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force Mammography Guideline Revisions.Journal of community health · 2020Article
- Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening: Patterns Among Women With Medicaid and Commercial Insurance.American journal of preventive medicine · 2019Article
- Lack of Impact of the 2009 USPSTF Guidelines on Rates of Mammography Screening.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2018Article
- Breast cancer screening outreach effectiveness: Mammogram-specific reminders vs. comprehensive preventive services birthday letters.Preventive medicine · 2017Article
- Change in Breast Cancer Screening Intervals Since the 2009 USPSTF Guideline.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2017Article
- Intra-articular Hyaluronic Acid for Knee Osteoarthritis: Stabilizing Utilization Trends Amid Conflicting Clinical Practice Guidelines.JB & JS open accessArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo examine the effect of a change in U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) screening guidelines on mammography rates in the United States. PRINCIPAL
findingsIn 2010, the year following the change in guidelines, 12-month mammography prevalence among women aged 40-49 years fell by 2.09 percentage points (95 percent confidence interval [CI]: -2.87 to -1.31) from 54.63 percent in 2008. For women aged 50-74 years, and aged 75 years and older, 12-month screening rates were 2.21 (95 percent CI: -2.65 to -1.77) and 3.60 (95 percent CI: -4.48 to -2.70) percentage points lower than those in 2008. In 2012, for women aged 40-49 years, 12-month prevalence fell to 52.51 percent, a decline of 2.12 percentage points (95 percent CI: -2.79 to -1.32) relative to screening rates prior the USPSTF announcement. For women aged 50-74 years and aged 75 years and older screening rates were 2.45 (95 percent CI: -2.96 to -2.07) and 5.71 (95 percent CI: -6.61 to -4.81) percentage points lower, respectively, in 2012 than in 2008.
conclusionThis study demonstrates an immediate and lasting reduction in the rates of breast cancer screening among women of all age groups after the 2009 revision of screening guidelines by the USPSTF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.