Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26799938›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Gradient Index Microlens Implanted in Prefrontal Cortex of Mouse Does Not Affect Behavioral Test Performance over Time.

Seon A Lee, Kevin S Holly, Vladislav Voziyanov, Stephanie L Villalba, Rudi Tong, Holly E Grigsby, Edward Glasscock, Francis G Szele, Ioannis Vlachos, Teresa A Murray

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Seon A LeeCenter for Biomedical Research and Rehabilitation Sciences, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, Louisiana, United States of America.
Kevin S HollyCenter for Biomedical Research and Rehabilitation Sciences, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, Louisiana, United States of America.
Vladislav VoziyanovCenter for Biomedical Research and Rehabilitation Sciences, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, Louisiana, United States of America.
Stephanie L VillalbaDepartment of Cellular Biology and Anatomy, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA, United States of America.
Rudi TongDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Holly E GrigsbyCenter for Biomedical Research and Rehabilitation Sciences, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, Louisiana, United States of America.
Edward GlasscockDepartment of Cellular Biology and Anatomy, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA, United States of America.
Francis G SzeleDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Ioannis VlachosCenter for Biomedical Research and Rehabilitation Sciences, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, Louisiana, United States of America.
Teresa A MurrayCenter for Biomedical Research and Rehabilitation Sciences, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, Louisiana, United States of America.
Louisiana Tech University · USLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport · USUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Excitability mechanisms of neurocardiac regulationR00HL107641 · NHLBI · LOUISIANA STATE UNIV HSC SHREVEPORT · PI GLASSCOCK, ALBERT E · 2013 to 2015
$726k
Long Term 3D Imaging of Mouse Brain In Vivo to Study Glial Cells and GliogenesisR21HD075376 · NICHD · LOUISIANA TECH UNIVERSITY · PI MURRAY, TERESA ANN · 2012 to 2013
$295k
NHLBI NIH HHS R00 HL107641NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD075376
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Implanted gradient index lenses have extended the reach of standard multiphoton microscopy from the upper layers of the mouse cortex to the lower cortical layers and even subcortical regions. These lenses have the clarity to visualize dynamic activities, such as calcium transients, with subcellular and millisecond resolution and the stability to facilitate repeated imaging over weeks and months. In addition, behavioral tests can be used to correlate performance with observed changes in network function and structure that occur over time. Yet, this raises the questions, does an implanted microlens have an effect on behavioral tests, and if so, what is the extent of the effect? To answer these questions, we compared the performance of three groups of mice in three common behavioral tests. A gradient index lens was implanted in the prefrontal cortex of experimental mice. We compared their performance with mice that had either a cranial window or a sham surgery. Three presurgical and five postsurgical sets of behavioral tests were performed over seven weeks. Behavioral tests included rotarod, foot fault, and Morris water maze. No significant differences were found between the three groups, suggesting that microlens implantation did not affect performance. The results for the current study clear the way for combining behavioral studies with gradient index lens imaging in the prefrontal cortex, and potentially other regions of the mouse brain, to study structural, functional, and behavioral relationships in the brain.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalBehavior Rating ScaleFemaleGreen Fluorescent ProteinsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImplants, ExperimentalLensesMaleMaze LearningMiceMice, TransgenicMicroscopy, Fluorescence, MultiphotonNeuroimagingPrefrontal CortexPsychomotor PerformanceGreen Fluorescent Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26799938
PMCPMC4723314
OpenAlexW2410365847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.