ArticleAmerican journal of hematology2016
Interactions and relevance of blast percentage and treatment strategy among younger and older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).
Article in American journal of hematology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning to Predict Risk of Relapse Using Cytologic Image Markers in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Posthematopoietic Cell Transplantation.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2022Trial
- Clinical benefit of glasdegib plus low-dose cytarabine in patients with de novo and secondary acute myeloid leukemia: long-term analysis of a phase II randomized trial.Annals of hematology · 2021Trial
- Intensive chemotherapy is more effective than hypomethylating agents for the treatment of younger patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and elevated bone marrow blasts.American journal of hematology · 2019Trial
- Comment on: "Clinical interrogation ofHaematologica · 2026Article
- Genetic and Clinical Features in TP53-Mutated Patients With Myelodysplastic Neoplasms: A Retrospective Study Based on Next-Generation Sequencing Data.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Associations of rs55829688 and rs145204276 Promoter Variants with lncRNABiomedicines · 2026Article
- Survival predictors in Vietnamese elderly AML patients treated with decitabine: Real-world evidence from a low- and middle-income country.Leukemia research reports · 2026Article
- Effects of Botanical Supplementation on Benzene-Induced Hematological, Histopathological, and Molecular Alterations in Rats : Short title: Botanical Supplementation In Benzene-Induced Leukemia Rats.Galen medical journal · 2026Article
- A tour of leukemia progress in 2025, viewed through the MD Anderson leukemia research lens.Cancer · 2025Review
- Functional cure with single agent olutasidenib in relapsed IDH1/NPM1 co-mutated AML.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Clinical interrogation ofHaematologica · 2025Article
- Resolving Leukemia Heterogeneity and Lineage Aberrations with HematoMap.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Acute Myeloid Leukemia: 2025 Update on Diagnosis, Risk-Stratification, and Management.American journal of hematology · 2025Review
- How to improve AML outcomes?Blood research · 2024Review
- Deregulation of New Cell Death Mechanisms in Leukemia.Cancers · 2024Review
- Understanding the Continuum between High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Acute Myeloid Leukemia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Article
- The metabolic enzyme hexokinase 2 localizes to the nucleus in AML and normal haematopoietic stem and progenitor cells to maintain stemness.Nature cell biology · 2022Article
- "Blasts" in myeloid neoplasms - how do we define blasts and how do we incorporate them into diagnostic schema moving forward?Leukemia · 2022Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is defined as ≥20% myeloblasts, representing a change from original guidelines where ≤30% blasts were considered as myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), and 20-29% blasts classified as refractory anemia with excess blasts in transformation (RAEB-T). Whether the diagnostic bone marrow blast percentage has current value with regards to patient prognostication or identification of optimal treatment strategies is unclear. We retrospectively studied 1652 treatment-naïve adults with MDS or AML and ≥10% blasts from January 2000 to April 2014. Patients with 20-29% blasts were more similar to MDS patients in terms of advanced age, increased frequency of poor-risk cytogenetics, lower WBC count, and less frequent NPM1 and FLT3-ITD mutations. Median overall survival of MDS and RAEB-T were similar, 16.0 and 16.0 months, compared to 13.5 months for AML with ≥30% blasts (P = 0.045). Multivariate analysis showed inferior survival with increased age (HR 1.81 age 60-69, HR 2.68 age ≥70, P < 0.0005); poor-risk cytogenetics (HR 2.25, P < 0.0005); therapy-related disease (HR 1.44, P < 0.0005); and markers of proliferative disease including WBC ≥25 × 10(9) /L (HR 1.35, P = 0.0003), elevated LDH count (HR 1.24, P = 0.0015), and peripheral blasts (HR 1.25, P = 0.004). Among younger patients (≤60 years), intensive AML-type therapy resulted in similar outcomes regardless of blast percentage, suggesting this to be optimal therapy in this context. Among older patients (≥70 years), patients with 20-29% blasts had similar outcomes to patients with <20% blasts, and better than those with ≥30% blasts. In addition, among older patients, epigenetic therapy provided at least equivalent outcome to intensive chemotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.