Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26799610›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of hematology2016

Interactions and relevance of blast percentage and treatment strategy among younger and older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).

Courtney D DiNardo, Guillermo Garcia-Manero, Sherry Pierce, Aziz Nazha, Carlos Bueso-Ramos, Elias Jabbour, Farhad Ravandi, Jorge Cortes, Hagop Kantarjian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of hematology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Clinical interrogation ofHaematologica · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. How to improve AML outcomes?Blood research · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Courtney D DiNardoDepartment of Leukemia, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Guillermo Garcia-ManeroDepartment of Leukemia, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Sherry PierceDepartment of Leukemia, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Aziz NazhaDepartment of Hematologic Oncology and Blood Disorders, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, Ohio.
Carlos Bueso-RamosDepartment of Hematopathology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Elias JabbourDepartment of Leukemia, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Farhad RavandiDepartment of Leukemia, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Jorge CortesDepartment of Leukemia, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Hagop KantarjianDepartment of Leukemia, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS CA01667NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is defined as ≥20% myeloblasts, representing a change from original guidelines where ≤30% blasts were considered as myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), and 20-29% blasts classified as refractory anemia with excess blasts in transformation (RAEB-T). Whether the diagnostic bone marrow blast percentage has current value with regards to patient prognostication or identification of optimal treatment strategies is unclear. We retrospectively studied 1652 treatment-naïve adults with MDS or AML and ≥10% blasts from January 2000 to April 2014. Patients with 20-29% blasts were more similar to MDS patients in terms of advanced age, increased frequency of poor-risk cytogenetics, lower WBC count, and less frequent NPM1 and FLT3-ITD mutations. Median overall survival of MDS and RAEB-T were similar, 16.0 and 16.0 months, compared to 13.5 months for AML with ≥30% blasts (P = 0.045). Multivariate analysis showed inferior survival with increased age (HR 1.81 age 60-69, HR 2.68 age ≥70, P < 0.0005); poor-risk cytogenetics (HR 2.25, P < 0.0005); therapy-related disease (HR 1.44, P < 0.0005); and markers of proliferative disease including WBC ≥25 × 10(9) /L (HR 1.35, P = 0.0003), elevated LDH count (HR 1.24, P = 0.0015), and peripheral blasts (HR 1.25, P = 0.004). Among younger patients (≤60 years), intensive AML-type therapy resulted in similar outcomes regardless of blast percentage, suggesting this to be optimal therapy in this context. Among older patients (≥70 years), patients with 20-29% blasts had similar outcomes to patients with <20% blasts, and better than those with ≥30% blasts. In addition, among older patients, epigenetic therapy provided at least equivalent outcome to intensive chemotherapy.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAge FactorsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBlast CrisisBone MarrowDisease-Free SurvivalHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteLeukocyte CountMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisMyelodysplastic SyndromesNucleophosminRetrospective StudiesNucleophosmin

Identifiers

PMID26799610
PMCPMC5486407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.