Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26799184›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2016

Comparison of liver oncogenic potential among human RAS isoforms.

Sook In Chung, Hyuk Moon, Hye-Lim Ju, Dae Yeong Kim, Kyung Joo Cho, Silvia Ribback, Frank Dombrowski, Diego F Calvisi, Simon Weonsang Ro

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The role of KRAS splice variants in cancer biology.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. KRAS4A induces metastatic lung adenocarcinomas in vivo in the absence of the KRAS4B isoform.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Calmodulin and PI3K Signaling inTrends in cancer · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sook In ChungInstitute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Hyuk MoonInstitute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Hye-Lim JuLiver Cirrhosis Clinical Research Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Dae Yeong KimInstitute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Kyung Joo ChoInstitute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Silvia RibbackInstitute of Pathology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Frank DombrowskiInstitute of Pathology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Diego F CalvisiInstitute of Pathology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Simon Weonsang RoInstitute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Yonsei University · KRUniversitätsmedizin Greifswald · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mutation in one of three RAS genes (i.e., HRAS, KRAS, and NRAS) leading to constitutive activation of RAS signaling pathways is considered a key oncogenic event in human carcinogenesis. Whether activated RAS isoforms possess different oncogenic potentials remains an unresolved question. Here, we compared oncogenic properties among RAS isoforms using liver-specific transgenesis in mice. Hydrodynamic transfection was performed using transposons expressing short hairpin RNA downregulating p53 and an activated RAS isoform, and livers were harvested at 23 days after gene delivery. No differences were found in the hepatocarcinogenic potential among RAS isoforms, as determined by both gross examination of livers and liver weight per body weight ratio (LW/BW) of mice expressing HRASQ61L, KRAS4BG12V and NRASQ61K. However, the tumorigenic potential differed significantly between KRAS splicing variants. The LW/BW ratio in KRAS4AG12V mice was significantly lower than in KRAS4BG12V mice (p < 0.001), and KRAS4AG12V mice lived significantly longer than KRRAS4BG12V mice (p < 0.0001). Notably, tumors from KRAS4AG12V mice displayed higher expression of the p16INK4A tumor suppressor when compared with KRAS4BG12V tumors. Forced overexpression of p16INK4A significantly reduced tumor growth in KRAS4BG12V mice, suggesting that upregulation of p16INK4A by KRAS4AG12V presumably delays tumor development driven by the latter oncogene.

Indexed as

AnimalsApoptosisBlotting, WesternCarcinoma, HepatocellularCell ProliferationCell Transformation, NeoplasticCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGTP PhosphohydrolasesHumansImmunoenzyme TechniquesLiver NeoplasmsMembrane ProteinsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMutationCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16GTP PhosphohydrolasesHRAS protein, humanKRAS protein, humanMembrane ProteinsNRAS protein, humanProtein IsoformsProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)hydrodynamic transfectionKRAS splicing variantliver cancerP16-INK4ARAS isoform

Identifiers

PMID26799184
PMCPMC4872791
OpenAlexW2266366869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.