Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26798733›Full record

ArticleAorta (Stamford, Conn.)2014

Development of Mega-Aorta Following Incompletely Treated Giant Cell Arteritis.

Darwin Eton, Atman P Shah, Aurelie Merlo, Karin Dill, Mark J Russo

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Aorta (Stamford, Conn.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Darwin EtonSection of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois;
Atman P ShahSection of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois;
Aurelie MerloCardiovascular Clinical Research Unit, Barnabas Heart Hospitals, Newark, New Jersey;
Karin DillDepartment of Radiology, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois; and.
Mark J Russo

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An 82-year-old male presented with a 9.3 cm ascending aorta and arch aneurysm with additional aneurysms of the innominate, right subclavian, and left common carotid arteries. The patient had a history of temporal arteritis that was only briefly treated in 1989 and a 6 cm ascending aortic aneurysm that was repaired in 1993. Our operative strategy was to construct a temporary parallel cerebrovascular circuit for cerebral protection during the redo-sternotomy and aortic arch reconstruction, with the added benefit of permanently excluding the branch arch vessel aneurysms. Pathological analysis of the aortic specimen at the first operation may have identified giant cell arteritis, prompting medical therapy against further disease progression.

Indexed as

Aortic aneurysmCarotid arteryInflammationSubclavian artery

Identifiers

PMID26798733
PMCPMC4682727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.