Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26798491›Full record

ArticleActa naturae

Cancer Stem Cells: Plasticity Works against Therapy.

T V Vinogradova, I P Chernov, G S Monastyrskaya, L G Kondratyeva, E D Sverdlov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta naturae. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Cervical Carcinoma: Oncobiology and Biomarkers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Circulating cancer stem cells: an interesting niche to explore.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

T V VinogradovaShemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences.
I P ChernovShemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences.
G S MonastyrskayaShemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences.
L G KondratyevaShemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences.
E D SverdlovShemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Great successes in identification and deciphering of mechanisms of the adult stem cells regulation have given rise to the idea that stem cells can also function in tumors as central elements of their development, starting from the initial stage and continuing until metastasis. Such cells were called cancer stem cells (CSCs). Over the course of intense discussion, the CSCs hypothesis gradually began to be perceived as an obvious fact. Recently, the existence of CSCs has been indeed confirmed in a number of works. However, when are CSCs universal prerequisites of tumors and to what extent their role is essential for tumor evolution remains an issue far from resolved. Likewise, the problem of potential use of CSCs as therapeutic targets remains unsolved. The present review attempts to analyze the issue of cancer stem cells and the potential of targeting them in tumor therapy.

Indexed as

cancercancer stem cellsclonal evolutionhierarchical structure of the tumorstem cells

Identifiers

PMID26798491
PMCPMC4717249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.