Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26798483›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical policy and practice2016

Patient-centred innovation to ensure access to diabetes care in Cambodia: the case of MoPoTsyo.

Josefien van Olmen, Natalie Eggermont, Maurits van Pelt, Heang Hen, Jeroen de Man, François Schellevis, David H Peters, Maryam Bigdeli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Global Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes of Reduced GFR.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Using health markets to improve access to medicines: three case studies.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Josefien van OlmenDepartment of Public Health Antwerp, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nationalestraat 155, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium ; Department of General Practice & Elderly Medicine, EMGO, Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Natalie EggermontUniversity Hospital, University Hospital Brussels, Laarbeeklaan 101, Brussels, Belgium.
Maurits van PeltMoPoTsyo, #9E, Street 3C, Phum Trea 1, Stung Meanchey, 12352 Phnom Penh Cambodia.
Heang HenMoPoTsyo, #9E, Street 3C, Phum Trea 1, Stung Meanchey, 12352 Phnom Penh Cambodia.
Jeroen de ManDepartment of Public Health Antwerp, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nationalestraat 155, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium.
François SchellevisDepartment of General Practice & Elderly Medicine, EMGO, Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 Amsterdam, The Netherlands ; NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Otterstraat 118-124, Utrecht, 3513 CR The Netherlands.
David H PetersJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA.
Maryam BigdeliWorld Health Organisation, Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, 20 avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe increasing prevalence of chronic diseases puts a high burden on the health care systems of Low and Middle Income Countries which are often not adapted to provide the care needed. Peer support programmes are promoted to address health system constraints. This case study analyses a peer educator diabetes programme in Cambodia, MoPoTsyo, from a health system's perspective. Which strategies were used and how did these strategies change? How is the programme perceived?

methodsData were collected through semi-structured interviews with patients, MoPoTsyo staff and peer educators, contracted pharmacy staff and health workers, health care workers and non-contracted pharmacists and managers and policy makers at district, provincial and national level. Four areas were purposively selected to do the interviews. An inductive content analysis was done independently by two researchers.

resultsMoPoTsyo developed into three stages: a focus on diabetes self-management; a widening scope to ensure affordable medicines and access to other health care services; and aiming for sustainability through more integration with the Cambodian public system and further upscaling. All respondents acknowledged the peer educators' role and competence in patient education, but their ideas about additional tasks and their place in the system differed. Indirectly involved stakeholders and district managers emphasized the particular roles and responsibilities of all actors in the system and the particular role of the peer educator in the community. MoPoTsyo's diagnostics and laboratory services were perceived as useful, especially by patients and project staff. Respondents were positive about the revolving drug fund, but expressed concerns about its integration into the government system. The degree of collaboration between health care staff and peer educators varied.

conclusionMoPoTsyo responds to the needs of people with diabetes in Cambodia. Key success factors were: consistent focus on and involvement of the target group, backed up by a strong organisation; simultaneous reduction of other barriers to care; and the ongoing maintenance of relations at all levels within the health system. Despite resistance, MoPoTsyo has established a more balanced relationship between patients and health service providers, empowering patients to self-manage and access services that meet their needs.

Indexed as

Chronic careChronic conditionsChronic diseasesDiabetes careHealth system analysisHealth systems researchPatient-centredPeer educatorSelf managementStakeholder analysis

Identifiers

PMID26798483
PMCPMC4720995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.