Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26797915›Full record

ArticleInfection2016

Should daptomycin-rifampin combinations for MSSA/MRSA isolates be avoided because of antagonism?

C Stein, O Makarewicz, C Forstner, S Weis, S Hagel, B Löffler, M W Pletz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Infection, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Daptomycin to bone and joint infections and prosthesis joint infections: a systematic review.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Increasing the Efficacy of Treatment ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. [Antibiotic stewardship and Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2017
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

C SteinCenter for Infectious Diseases and Infection's Control, Jena University Hospital, Erlanger Allee 101, 07747, Jena, Germany.
O MakarewiczCenter for Infectious Diseases and Infection's Control, Jena University Hospital, Erlanger Allee 101, 07747, Jena, Germany.
C ForstnerCenter for Infectious Diseases and Infection's Control, Jena University Hospital, Erlanger Allee 101, 07747, Jena, Germany.
S WeisCenter for Infectious Diseases and Infection's Control, Jena University Hospital, Erlanger Allee 101, 07747, Jena, Germany.
S HagelCenter for Infectious Diseases and Infection's Control, Jena University Hospital, Erlanger Allee 101, 07747, Jena, Germany.
B LöfflerInstitute of Medical Microbiology, Jena University Hospital, Erlanger Allee 101, 07747, Jena, Germany.
M W PletzCenter for Infectious Diseases and Infection's Control, Jena University Hospital, Erlanger Allee 101, 07747, Jena, Germany. mathias.pletz@med.uni-jena.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8157-2753
Jena University Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThere is increasing clinical evidence from observational studies, that combination therapy of daptomycin with rifampin is a valuable treatment option for biofilm-associated difficult to treat Staphylococcus aureus infections such as osteomyelitis, prosthetic joint infection and endocarditis. However, two studies analyzing a limited number of S. aureus isolates reported an antagonism of those two drugs questioning the benefit of this combination.

methodsTo estimate the frequency of this possible antagonism, we performed in vitro checkerboard assays on 58 consecutive clinical isolates of S. aureus (MSSA n = 9, MRSA n = 49). We determined the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) and the susceptible breakpoint index (SBPI). All isolates were characterized by a microprobe array detecting 336 different genes/alleles to ensure their non-clonal origin.

resultsFor all isolates, the FICI was between 1.00 and 1.25 indicating additive effects for the daptomycin/rifampin combination. Neither antagonism nor synergism as defined by the FICI was found for any of the isolates.

conclusionBased on these data, there is no evidence to advise against the daptomycin/rifampin combination therapy.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsChild, PreschoolDaptomycinDrug AntagonismFemaleHumansInfantMaleMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedRifampinAnti-Bacterial AgentsDaptomycinRifampinCheckerboardFractional inhibitory concentration indexStaphylococcus aureusSynergism

Identifiers

PMID26797915
OpenAlexW2277716738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.