ReviewInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2016
Medical care and drug-related problems: Do doctors and pharmacists speak the same language?
Review in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence and associated factors for drug-related problems and polypharmacy identified by a pharmacist-led medication review in patients enrolled in a home healthcare program.BMC geriatrics · 2026Observational
- Exploring the Evolving Role of Pharmaceutical Services in Community Pharmacies: Insights from the USA, England, and Portugal.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Knowledge and Attitude of Iraqi Pharmacists Regarding the Adverse Effects of NSAIDs Based on Years of Experience.Turkish journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2025Article
- Structured medication reviews for adults with multimorbidity and polypharmacy in primary care: a systematic review protocol.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Evaluation of a pharmacist-led intervention to reduce drug-related problems in patients included in a home healthcare program: study protocol for a pragmatic randomized clinical trial.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
- Article
- Medication Errors and Type 2 Diabetes Management: A Qualitative Exploration of Physicians' Perceptions, Experiences and Expectations From Quetta City, Pakistan.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Hospital admissions to geriatric ward related to adverse drug events: a cross-sectional study from the Czech Republic.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2021Article
- Article
- Mapping of drug-related problems among older adults conciliating medical and pharmaceutical approaches.European geriatric medicine · 2021Review
- Categorizing and understanding medication errors in hospital pharmacy in relation to human factors.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2020Article
- Today the pharmacy world lost a leader in pharmaceutical care.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2020Article
- Drug therapy problems for patients with tuberculosis and HIV/AIDS at a reference hospital.Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2019Article
- Translation and validation of a tool to assess the impact of clinical pharmacists' interventions.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2019Article
- PCNE definition of medication review: reaching agreement.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2018Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Optimal communication between physicians and pharmacists is important for patient care. However, pharmacists and doctors do not always seem to understand each other. They have been professionalized differently, and do not always speak the same language. Especially in the areas of prescribing, medication review, and medicine use, there can be differences in views. This contribution clarifies some essential concepts that doctors and pharmacists use. Thus we hope that our commentary contributes to a better understanding of each other's role and the importance of interprofessional cooperation for the benefit of the patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26797769What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.