Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26797253›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2016

Granulocyte growth factor use in elderly patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in the United States: adherence to guidelines and comparative effectiveness.

Linda S Elting, Ying Xu, Mariana Chavez-MacGregor, Sharon H Giordano

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Linda S EltingDepartment of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd. Unit 1444, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. lelting@mdanderson.org.
Ying XuDepartment of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd. Unit 1444, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Mariana Chavez-MacGregorDepartment of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd. Unit 1444, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Sharon H GiordanoDepartment of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd. Unit 1444, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe efficacy of prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) among elderly patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) receiving CHOP-based chemotherapy has been demonstrated in clinical trials, and G-CSFs are recommended in guidelines. We studied guideline adherence and the effectiveness of G-CSFs in the general population.

methodsWe used inpatient and outpatient claims from nationally representative databases linked to cancer information from tumor registries. Patients (N = 5884) diagnosed with NHL between 2001 and 2007 who were older than 65 years and who received CHOP-based chemotherapy were included. Adherence to guidelines was measured as the use of G-CSFs within 7 days of the first dose of chemotherapy. The measures of effectiveness were fever, infection, and death during cycle 1 of chemotherapy and time to cycle 2. Multiple-variable models of these outcomes were developed using logistic regression, controlling for demographic, clinical, and provider factors.

resultsG-CSF use increased from 32 % in 2001 to 72 % in 2007. Patients who received G-CSFs were significantly less likely to have outpatient encounters for infection than those who did not receive early G-CSFs (35 vs 47 %; p < 0.0001). Inpatient encounters for infection were similarly prevalent among patients who did or did not receive early G-CSFs (5 vs 4 %; p = 0.2). There was no association between G-CSF use and death during cycle 1.

conclusionsAdherence to guidelines increased after publication of clinical trials and exceeded 70 % after publication of guidelines. G-CSFs were effective in preventing outpatient encounters for fever or infection, but not inpatient encounters or deaths during cycle 1.

Indexed as

Guideline AdherenceOutcome Assessment, Health CareAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCyclophosphamideDoxorubicinFebrile NeutropeniaFemaleGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorHumansLymphoma, Non-HodgkinMalePrednisoloneUnited StatesVincristineCyclophosphamideDoxorubicinGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorPrednisoloneVincristineFebrile neutropeniaGranulocyte growth factorsGuideline adherenceSEER-Medicare

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.