Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26797222›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2016

Incidental radiologic findings at breast cancer diagnosis and likelihood of disease recurrence.

Joel M Brothers, Kelley M Kidwell, Richard K J Brown, N Lynn Henry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joel M BrothersDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr., Med Inn Bldg C450, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5843, USA.
Kelley M KidwellDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Richard K J BrownDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
N Lynn HenryDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr., Med Inn Bldg C450, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5843, USA. norahh@med.umich.edu.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

XenograftP30CA046592 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI THEODORE S LAWRENCE · 1988 to 2026
$178.2M
NCI NIH HHS 3-P30-CA046592NCI NIH HHS P30 CA046592
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite guidelines recommending against its routine use, perioperative imaging for distant metastases is frequently performed in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients, uncovering incidental findings of uncertain significance. We assessed the clinical significance of incidental findings by determining if their presence is associated with disease recurrence. A retrospective review of staging imaging was performed in patients with stage II or III invasive breast cancer diagnosed during 2008-2009 at a large academic medical center. Data related to perioperative imaging and disease recurrence were abstracted from the medical record. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the association between incidental findings and time to disease recurrence. A total of 169 of 340 patients (49.7 %) underwent staging evaluation for distant metastases (CT chest, abdomen, pelvis, bone scan, and/or PET-CT). Of these, 146 (86.4 %) had at least one suspicious or indeterminate finding. Follow-up studies were performed in 73 (43.2 %) patients. Nineteen patients were diagnosed with metastatic disease at diagnosis, 18 of whom had stage III disease. In patients without metastatic disease at diagnosis, 32 later developed recurrence. Non-calcified pulmonary nodules were associated with shorter time to disease recurrence (hazard ratio 2.51, 95 % CI 1.13-5.57, p = 0.02). Imaging for distant metastases frequently reveals indeterminate findings, most of which are not associated with disease recurrence. The association between pulmonary nodules and recurrence warrants validation in an independent cohort. Overall, these findings support current guidelines recommending against routine extent of disease evaluation in patients with newly diagnosed stage II breast cancer.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidental FindingsMaleMiddle AgedMultimodal ImagingNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPositron-Emission TomographyProbabilityRadiologyRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedBone ScanBreast CancerCTIncidental FindingsPETStaging

Identifiers

PMID26797222
PMCPMC4734930
OpenAlexW2259950799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.