Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26797198›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2016

Impact of a low-technology simulation-based obstetric and newborn care training scheme on non-emergency delivery practices in Guatemala.

Anna Walton, Edgar Kestler, Julia C Dettinger, Sarah Zelek, Francesca Holme, Dilys Walker

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06509113 (Reducing Stigmatizing Attitudes and Behaviors of Nursing Students in Simulated Clinical Visits of Patients Living With HIV in Iran), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06509113 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Reducing Stigmatizing Attitudes and Behaviors of Nursing Students in Simulated Clinical Visits of Patients Living With HIV in Iran

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2024 to 2025Enrolled70ConditionsStigma, Social, HIV InfectionsArmsThe online HIV-related stigma training, The online HIV epidemiology training with no specific content on stigma
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effectiveness of Communication Interventions in Obstetrics-A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anna WaltonSchool of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Edgar KestlerEpidemiological Research Center in Sexual and Reproductive Health, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Julia C DettingerDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. Electronic address: jcdettin@uw.edu.
Sarah ZelekDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Francesca HolmeDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Dilys WalkerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the effect of a low-technology simulation-based training scheme for obstetric and perinatal emergency management (PRONTO; Programa de Rescate Obstétrico y Neonatal: Tratamiento Óptimo y Oportuno) on non-emergency delivery practices at primary level clinics in Guatemala.

methodsA paired cross-sectional birth observation study was conducted with a convenience sample of 18 clinics (nine pairs of intervention and control clinics) from June 28 to August 7, 2013. Outcomes included implementation of practices known to decrease maternal and/or neonatal mortality and improve patient care.

resultsOverall, 25 and 17 births occurred in intervention and control clinics, respectively. Active management of the third stage of labor was appropriately performed by 20 (83%) of 24 intervention teams versus 7 (50%) of 14 control teams (P=0.015). Intervention teams implemented more practices to decrease neonatal mortality than did control teams (P<0.001). Intervention teams ensured patient privacy in 23 (92%) of 25 births versus 11 (65%) of 17 births for control teams (P=0.014). All 15 applicable intervention teams kept patients informed versus 6 (55%) of 11 control teams (P=0.001). Differences were also noted in teamwork; in particular, skill-based tools were used more often at intervention sites than control sites (P=0.012).

conclusionUse of PRONTO enhanced non-emergency delivery care by increasing evidence-based practice, patient-centered care, and teamwork.

Indexed as

Infant MortalityMaternal MortalityAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery, ObstetricEvidence-Based PracticeFemaleGuatemalaHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMidwiferyPatient-Centered CarePregnancyYoung AdultEmergency obstetric and newborn careGuatemalaMaternal mortalityNeonatal mortalitySkilled birth attendantsTraining

Identifiers

PMID26797198
PMCPMC4780429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.