Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26797188›Full record

ArticleThe International journal on drug policy2016

"Not on the agenda": A qualitative study of influences on health services use among poor young women who use drugs in Cape Town, South Africa.

Bronwyn Myers, Tara Carney, Wendee M Wechsberg

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The International journal on drug policy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Bronwyn MyersAlcohol, Tobacco and Other Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, P.O. Box 19070, Tygerberg, Cape Town 7505, South Africa; Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, Anzio Road, Observatory 7900, South Africa. Electronic address: bronwyn.myers@mrc.ac.za.
Tara CarneyAlcohol, Tobacco and Other Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, P.O. Box 19070, Tygerberg, Cape Town 7505, South Africa.
Wendee M WechsbergRTI International, 3040 E. Cornwallis Road, P.O. Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA; Gillings Global School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Psychology in the Public Interest, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA; Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Duke University · USSouth African Medical Research Council · ZAUniversity of Cape Town · ZA

Funding

Seek, Test, Treat & Retain Pilot for Out of School Teens at RiskR01DA032061 · NIDA · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI WECHSBERG, WENDEE M · 2011 to 2015
$4.0M
Linking high-risk young women to HIV prevention and care for comorbid conditionsR21HD082866 · NICHD · MEDICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL OF SOUTH AFRICA · PI MYERS, BRONWYN, WECHSBERG, WENDEE M · 2015 to 2016
$277k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD082866NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD082866-01NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA032061NIDA NIH HHS R01DA032061-04-S1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoor young women who use alcohol and other drugs (AODs) in Cape Town, South Africa, need access to health services to prevent HIV. Efforts to link young women to services are hampered by limited information on what influences service initiation. We explored perceptions of factors that influence poor AOD-using young women's use of health services.

methodsWe conducted four focus groups with young women (aged 16-21) who used AODs and were recruited from two township communities in Cape Town. We also conducted 14 in-depth interviews with health and social welfare service planners and providers. Discussion topics included young women's use of health services and perceived influences on service use. Qualitative data were analysed using a framework approach.

resultsThe findings highlighted structural, contextual, and systemic influences on the use of health services by young women who use AODs. First, young women were absent from the health agenda, which had an impact on the provision of women-specific services. Resource constraints and gender inequality were thought to contribute to this absence. Second, gender inequality and stigma toward young women who used AODs led to their social exclusion from education and employment opportunities and health care. Third, community poverty resulted in the emergence of perverse social capital and social disorder that limited social support for treatment. Fourth, the health care system was unresponsive to the multiple service needs of these young women.

conclusionTo reach young women who use AODs, interventions need to take cognisance of young women's risk environment and health systems need to adapt to respond better to their needs. For these interventions to be effective, gender must be placed on the policy agenda.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityAdolescentAlcohol-Related DisordersFemaleFocus GroupsHealth ServicesHIV InfectionsHumansInterviews as TopicPovertySex FactorsSocial EnvironmentSocial StigmaSocial SupportSocioeconomic FactorsSouth AfricaGenderHealth servicesHIVRisk environmentStructural contextSubstance abuse treatment needYoung women

Identifiers

PMID26797188
PMCPMC4829448
OpenAlexW2211675063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.