Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26797136›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2016

Imaging Findings Associated with Space-Occupying Edema in Patients with Large Middle Cerebral Artery Infarcts.

A D Horsch, J W Dankbaar, T A Stemerdink, E Bennink, T van Seeters, L J Kappelle, J Hofmeijer, H W de Jong, Y van der Graaf, B K Velthuis and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Crossed cerebellar diaschisis in acute ischemic stroke: Impact on morphologic and functional outcome.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2017
    Article
  14. A Biophysical Model for Cytotoxic Cell Swelling.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

A D HorschFrom the Departments of Radiology (A.D.H., J.W.D., T.A.S., E.B., T.v.S., H.W.d.J., B.K.V.) alexanderhorsch@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8213-2784
J W DankbaarFrom the Departments of Radiology (A.D.H., J.W.D., T.A.S., E.B., T.v.S., H.W.d.J., B.K.V.).ORCID 0000-0003-4646-9587
T A StemerdinkFrom the Departments of Radiology (A.D.H., J.W.D., T.A.S., E.B., T.v.S., H.W.d.J., B.K.V.).ORCID 0000-0003-0988-0756
E BenninkFrom the Departments of Radiology (A.D.H., J.W.D., T.A.S., E.B., T.v.S., H.W.d.J., B.K.V.).ORCID 0000-0002-3689-8532
T van SeetersFrom the Departments of Radiology (A.D.H., J.W.D., T.A.S., E.B., T.v.S., H.W.d.J., B.K.V.).ORCID 0000-0001-8839-964X
L J KappelleNeurology (L.J.K.), Utrecht Stroke Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8665-6630
J HofmeijerDepartment of Neurology (J.H.), Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7593-5674
H W de JongFrom the Departments of Radiology (A.D.H., J.W.D., T.A.S., E.B., T.v.S., H.W.d.J., B.K.V.).ORCID 0000-0002-3000-8316
Y van der GraafJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (Y.v.d.G.), Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3590-3130
B K VelthuisFrom the Departments of Radiology (A.D.H., J.W.D., T.A.S., E.B., T.v.S., H.W.d.J., B.K.V.).ORCID 0000-0002-2542-9474
DUST investigators
Zimmer Biomet (Netherlands) · NLRijnstate Hospital · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeProminent space-occupying cerebral edema is a devastating complication occurring in some but not all patients with large MCA infarcts. It is unclear why differences in the extent of edema exist. Better knowledge of factors related to prominent edema formation could aid treatment strategies. This study aimed to identify variables associated with the development of prominent edema in patients with large MCA infarcts. MATERIALS AND

methodsFrom the Dutch Acute Stroke Study (DUST), 137 patients were selected with large MCA infarcts on follow-up NCCT (3 ± 2 days after stroke onset), defined as ASPECTS ≤4. Prominent edema was defined as a midline shift of ≥5 mm on follow-up. Admission patient and treatment characteristics were collected. Admission CT parameters used were ASPECTS on NCCT and CBV and MTT maps, and occlusion site, clot burden, and collaterals on CTA. Permeability on admission CTP, and day 3 recanalization and reperfusion statuses were obtained if available. Unadjusted and adjusted (age and NIHSS) odds ratios were calculated for all variables in relation to prominent edema.

resultsProminent edema developed in 51 patients (37%). Adjusted odds ratios for prominent edema were higher with lower ASPECTS on NCCT (adjusted odds ratio, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.13-1.55) and CBV (adjusted odds ratio, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.07-1.49), higher permeability (adjusted odds ratio, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.30-4.24), more proximal thrombus location (adjusted odds ratio, 3.40; 95% CI, 1.57-7.37), higher clot burden (adjusted odds ratio, 2.88; 95% CI, 1.11-7.45), and poor collaterals (adjusted odds ratio, 3.93; 95% CI, 1.78-8.69).

conclusionsExtensive proximal occlusion, poor collaterals, and larger ischemic deficits with higher permeability play a role in the development of prominent edema in large MCA infarcts.

Indexed as

EdemaFemaleHumansInfarction, Middle Cerebral ArteryMiddle AgedNeuroimagingOdds Ratio

Identifiers

PMID26797136
PMCPMC7960291
OpenAlexW2346476075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.