ArticleScientific reports2016
In silico functional dissection of saturation mutagenesis: Interpreting the relationship between phenotypes and changes in protein stability, interactions and activity.
Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
64 citing papers in PubMed, 106 citations in OpenAlex.
- AI-GuidedJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2026Article
- An interpretable molecular framework for predicting cancer driver missense mutations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Comprehensive Approaches to Protein Detection and Analysis in Mycobacterium tuberculosis.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- Systematic evaluation of predictors for binding free energy changes upon mutations in protein complexes.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- A hybrid framework of generative deep learning for antiviral peptide discovery.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Structural Characterisation of TetR/AcrR Regulators inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Prediction of mutation-induced protein stability changes based on the geometric representations learned by a self-supervised method.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Prediction of Deleterious Single Amino Acid Polymorphisms with a Consensus Holdout Sampler.Current genomics · 2024Article
- Characterizing and predicting ccRCC-causing missense mutations in Von Hippel-Lindau disease.Human molecular genetics · 2024Article
- Mendelian randomization identifies circulating proteins as biomarkers for age at menarche and age at natural menopause.Communications biology · 2024Article
- AI-Driven Enhancements in Drug Screening and Optimization.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- ECEL1 novel mutation in arthrogryposis type 5D: A molecular dynamic simulation study.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2023Article
- Using Graph-Based Signatures to Guide Rational Antibody Engineering.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- A recurrent de novo splice site variant involving DNM1 exon 10a causes developmental and epileptic encephalopathy through a dominant-negative mechanism.American journal of human genetics · 2022Article
- Addressing Noise and Estimating Uncertainty in Biomedical Data through the Exploration of Chemical Space.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Predicting protein stability changes upon single-point mutation: a thorough comparison of the available tools on a new dataset.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Systematic evaluation of computational tools to predict the effects of mutations on protein stability in the absence of experimental structures.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Coding and regulatory variants are associated with serum protein levels and disease.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Challenges in predicting stabilizing variations: An exploration.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022Article
- mmCSM-PPI: predicting the effects of multiple point mutations on protein-protein interactions.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Despite interest in associating polymorphisms with clinical or experimental phenotypes, functional interpretation of mutation data has lagged behind generation of data from modern high-throughput techniques and the accurate prediction of the molecular impact of a mutation remains a non-trivial task. We present here an integrated knowledge-driven computational workflow designed to evaluate the effects of experimental and disease missense mutations on protein structure and interactions. We exemplify its application with analyses of saturation mutagenesis of DBR1 and Gal4 and show that the experimental phenotypes for over 80% of the mutations correlate well with predicted effects of mutations on protein stability and RNA binding affinity. We also show that analysis of mutations in VHL using our workflow provides valuable insights into the effects of mutations, and their links to the risk of developing renal carcinoma. Taken together the analyses of the three examples demonstrate that structural bioinformatics tools, when applied in a systematic, integrated way, can rapidly analyse a given system to provide a powerful approach for predicting structural and functional effects of thousands of mutations in order to reveal molecular mechanisms leading to a phenotype. Missense or non-synonymous mutations are nucleotide substitutions that alter the amino acid sequence of a protein. Their effects can range from modifying transcription, translation, processing and splicing, localization, changing stability of the protein, altering its dynamics or interactions with other proteins, nucleic acids and ligands, including small molecules and metal ions. The advent of high-throughput techniques including sequencing and saturation mutagenesis has provided large amounts of phenotypic data linked to mutations. However, one of the hurdles has been understanding and quantifying the effects of a particular mutation, and how they translate into a given phenotype. One approach to overcome this is to use robust, accurate and scalable computational methods to understand and correlate structural effects of mutations with disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.