Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26797035›Full record

ReviewThe European respiratory journal2016

A review of national guidelines for management of COPD in Europe.

Marc Miravitlles, Claus Vogelmeier, Nicolas Roche, David Halpin, João Cardoso, Alexander G Chuchalin, Hannu Kankaanranta, Thomas Sandström, Paweł Śliwiński, Jaromir Zatloukal and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The European respiratory journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The economic burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in Europe: results from a systematic review of the literature.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Fractional Dynamics Foster Deep Learning of COPD Stage Prediction.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Observational
  20. Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Marc MiravitllesPneumology Dept, University Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Ciber de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Barcelona, Spain mmiravitlles@vhebron.net.
Claus VogelmeierDept of Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University Medical Center Giessen and Marburg, Philipps-University Marburg, German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Marburg, Germany.
Nicolas RocheService de Pneumologie et Soins Intensifs Respiratoires, Hôpital Cochin, University Paris Descartes (EA2511), Paris, France.
David HalpinRoyal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, UK.
João CardosoHospital de Santa Marta, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Alexander G ChuchalinInstitute of Pulmonology, Federal Medical and Biological Agency, Moscow, Russia.
Hannu KankaanrantaDept of Respiratory Medicine, Seinäjoki Central Hospital, Seinäjoki, Finland Dept of Respiratory Medicine, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.
Thomas SandströmDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Medicine Unit, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Paweł Śliwiński2nd Department of Respiratory Medicine, Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases, Warsaw, Poland.
Jaromir ZatloukalDept of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Francesco BlasiDept of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano, IRCCS Fondazione Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Cà Granda, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The quality of care can be improved by the development and implementation of evidence-based treatment guidelines. Different national guidelines for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exist in Europe and relevant differences may exist among them.This was an evaluation of COPD treatment guidelines published in Europe and Russia in the past 7 years. Each guideline was reviewed in detail and information about the most important aspects of patient diagnosis, risk stratification and pharmacotherapy was extracted following a standardised process. Guidelines were available from the Czech Republic, England and Wales, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Spain and Sweden. The treatment goals, criteria for COPD diagnosis, consideration of comorbidities in treatment selection and support for use of long-acting bronchodilators, were similar across treatment guidelines. There were differences in measures used for stratification of disease severity, consideration of patient phenotypes, criteria for the use of inhaled corticosteroids and recommendations for other medications (e.g. theophylline and mucolytics) in addition to bronchodilators.There is generally good agreement on treatment goals, criteria for diagnosis of COPD and use of long-acting bronchodilators as the cornerstone of treatment among guidelines for COPD management in Europe and Russia. However, there are differences in the definitions of patient subgroups and other recommended treatments.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicAdrenal Cortex HormonesBronchodilator AgentsCzech RepublicDisease ManagementEnglandEuropeEvidence-Based MedicineExpectorantsFinlandFranceGermanyHumansItalyPatient Care PlanningPatient SelectionAdrenal Cortex HormonesBronchodilator AgentsExpectorants

Identifiers

PMID26797035
PMCPMC4733567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.