Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26796549›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2016

Gap Gene Regulatory Dynamics Evolve along a Genotype Network.

Anton Crombach, Karl R Wotton, Eva Jiménez-Guri, Johannes Jaeger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Evolvability in vertebrate segmentation.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  4. Understanding developmental system drift.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Latent space of a small genetic network: Geometry of dynamics and information.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  11. In preprints: the problem of producing precise patterns.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. System drift and speciation.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Time and space in segmentation.Interface focus · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anton CrombachEMBL/CRG Systems Biology Research Unit, Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Dr. Aiguader 88, Barcelona 08003, Spain Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain anton.crombach@crg.eu yogi.jaeger@crg.eu johannes.jaeger@kli.ac.at.
Karl R WottonEMBL/CRG Systems Biology Research Unit, Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Dr. Aiguader 88, Barcelona 08003, Spain Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain.
Eva Jiménez-GuriEMBL/CRG Systems Biology Research Unit, Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Dr. Aiguader 88, Barcelona 08003, Spain Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain.
Johannes JaegerEMBL/CRG Systems Biology Research Unit, Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Dr. Aiguader 88, Barcelona 08003, Spain Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain anton.crombach@crg.eu yogi.jaeger@crg.eu johannes.jaeger@kli.ac.at.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developmental gene networks implement the dynamic regulatory mechanisms that pattern and shape the organism. Over evolutionary time, the wiring of these networks changes, yet the patterning outcome is often preserved, a phenomenon known as "system drift." System drift is illustrated by the gap gene network-involved in segmental patterning-in dipteran insects. In the classic model organism Drosophila melanogaster and the nonmodel scuttle fly Megaselia abdita, early activation and placement of gap gene expression domains show significant quantitative differences, yet the final patterning output of the system is essentially identical in both species. In this detailed modeling analysis of system drift, we use gene circuits which are fit to quantitative gap gene expression data in M. abdita and compare them with an equivalent set of models from D. melanogaster. The results of this comparative analysis show precisely how compensatory regulatory mechanisms achieve equivalent final patterns in both species. We discuss the larger implications of the work in terms of "genotype networks" and the ways in which the structure of regulatory networks can influence patterns of evolutionary change (evolvability).

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological EvolutionBody PatterningDevelopmental BiologyDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEvolution, MolecularGene ExpressionGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGene Regulatory NetworksGenes, RegulatorModels, GeneticPhylogenyDrosophila Proteinsevolutionary developmental biologyevolutionary systems biologygap gene network.network evolutionreverse engineeringsystem drift

Identifiers

PMID26796549
PMCPMC4839219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.