Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26796293›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurobiology2016

Brain-computer interfaces for dissecting cognitive processes underlying sensorimotor control.

Matthew D Golub, Steven M Chase, Aaron P Batista, Byron M Yu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurobiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matthew D GolubDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, United States; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Carnegie Mellon University & University of Pittsburgh, United States.
Steven M ChaseDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, United States; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Carnegie Mellon University & University of Pittsburgh, United States.
Aaron P BatistaCenter for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Carnegie Mellon University & University of Pittsburgh, United States; Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, United States; Systems Neuroscience Institute, University of Pittsburgh, United States.
Byron M YuDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, United States; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, United States; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Carnegie Mellon University & University of Pittsburgh, United States.

Funding

Shaping Neural Population Dynamics to Facilitate LearningR01HD071686 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BATISTA, AARON PAUL, CHASE, STEVEN M · 2011 to 2021
$3.7M
Surgery Core - NINDS Institutional Core Grants to Support Neuroscience ResearchP30NS076405 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI STRICK, PETER · 2012 to 2016
$1.8M
Differential contributions of frontal lobe areas to eye/hand coordinationR01NS065065 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BATISTA, AARON PAUL · 2011 to 2015
$1.8M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD071686NINDS NIH HHS P30 NS076405NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS065065
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensorimotor control engages cognitive processes such as prediction, learning, and multisensory integration. Understanding the neural mechanisms underlying these cognitive processes with arm reaching is challenging because we currently record only a fraction of the relevant neurons, the arm has nonlinear dynamics, and multiple modalities of sensory feedback contribute to control. A brain-computer interface (BCI) is a well-defined sensorimotor loop with key simplifying advantages that address each of these challenges, while engaging similar cognitive processes. As a result, BCI is becoming recognized as a powerful tool for basic scientific studies of sensorimotor control. Here, we describe the benefits of BCI for basic scientific inquiries and review recent BCI studies that have uncovered new insights into the neural mechanisms underlying sensorimotor control.

Indexed as

Brain-Computer InterfacesCognitionFeedback, SensoryNeurology

Identifiers

PMID26796293
PMCPMC4860084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.