Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26795942›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2016

Are village health sanitation and nutrition committees fulfilling their roles for decentralised health planning and action? A mixed methods study from rural eastern India.

Aradhana Srivastava, Rajkumar Gope, Nirmala Nair, Shibanand Rath, Suchitra Rath, Rajesh Sinha, Prabas Sahoo, Pavitra Mohan Biswal, Vijay Singh, Vikash Nath and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Precision mapping child undernutrition for nearly 600,000 inhabited census villages in India.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Aradhana SrivastavaPublic Health Foundation of India, Plot no. 47, Sector 44 Institutional Area, Gurgaon, 122002, New Delhi, Haryana, India. aradhana@phfi.org.
Rajkumar GopeEkjut, Chakradharpur, Jharkhand, India. rajkumar.ekjut@gmail.com.
Nirmala NairEkjut, Chakradharpur, Jharkhand, India. nirmala.ekjut@gmail.com.
Shibanand RathEkjut, Chakradharpur, Jharkhand, India. shibanand.ekjut@gmail.com.
Suchitra RathEkjut, Chakradharpur, Jharkhand, India. suchitra.ekjut@gmail.com.
Rajesh SinhaEkjut, Chakradharpur, Jharkhand, India. rajesh.ekjut@gmail.com.
Prabas SahooPublic Health Foundation of India, Plot no. 47, Sector 44 Institutional Area, Gurgaon, 122002, New Delhi, Haryana, India. prabas.odisha@gmail.com.
Pavitra Mohan BiswalEkjut, Chakradharpur, Jharkhand, India. pavitra.ekjut@gmail.com.
Vijay SinghEkjut, Chakradharpur, Jharkhand, India. vijay.ekjut@gmail.com.
Vikash NathEkjut, Chakradharpur, Jharkhand, India. vikash.ekjut@gmail.com.
H P S SachdevSitaram Bhartia Institute of Science and Research, New Delhi, India. hpssachdev@gmail.com.
Jolene Skordis-WorrallInstitute for Global Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK. j.skordis-worrall@ucl.ac.uk.
Hassan Haghparast-BidgoliInstitute for Global Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK. h.haghparast-bidgoli@ucl.ac.uk.
Anthony CostelloInstitute for Global Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK. anthony.costello@ucl.ac.uk.
Audrey ProstInstitute for Global Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK. audrey.prost@ucl.ac.uk.
Sanghita BhattacharyyaPublic Health Foundation of India, Plot no. 47, Sector 44 Institutional Area, Gurgaon, 122002, New Delhi, Haryana, India. sanghita@phfi.org.
Ekjut · INUniversity College London · GBPublic Health Foundation of India · INSitaram Bhartia Institute of Science and Research · IN

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K007270/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 099708/Z/12/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn India, Village Health Sanitation and Nutrition Committees (VHSNCs) are participatory community health forums, but there is little information about their composition, functioning and effectiveness. Our study examined VHSNCs as enablers of participatory action for community health in two rural districts in two states of eastern India - West Singhbhum in Jharkhand and Kendujhar, in Odisha.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey of 169 VHSNCs and ten qualitative focus group discussions with purposively selected better and poorer performing committees, across the two states. We analysed the quantitative data using descriptive statistics and the qualitative data using a Framework approach.

resultsWe found that VHSNCs comprised equitable representation from vulnerable groups when they were formed. More than 75 % members were women. Almost all members belonged to socially disadvantaged classes. Less than 1 % members had received any training. Supervision of committees by district or block officials was rare. Their work focused largely on strengthening village sanitation, conducting health awareness activities, and supporting medical treatment for ill or malnourished children and pregnant mothers. In reality, 62 % committees monitored community health workers, 6.5 % checked sub-centres and 2.4 % monitored drug availability with community health workers. Virtually none monitored data on malnutrition. Community health and nutrition workers acted as conveners and record keepers. Links with the community involved awareness generation and community monitoring of VHSNC activities. Key challenges included irregular meetings, members' limited understanding of their roles and responsibilities, restrictions on planning and fund utilisation, and weak linkages with the broader health system.

conclusionsOur study suggests that VHSNCs perform few of their specified functions for decentralized planning and action. If VHSNCs are to be instrumental in improving community health, sanitation and nutrition, they need education, mobilisation and monitoring for formal links with the wider health system.

Indexed as

Rural PopulationAdvisory CommitteesCommunity Health WorkersCommunity ParticipationCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFocus GroupsHealth PlanningHealth PromotionHumansIndiaMalnutritionPregnancyPublic HealthSanitationSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID26795942
PMCPMC4722712
OpenAlexW2253004079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.