Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26795874›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Neurology2016

Rivastigmine for gait stability in patients with Parkinson's disease (ReSPonD): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.

Emily J Henderson, Stephen R Lord, Matthew A Brodie, Daisy M Gaunt, Andrew D Lawrence, Jacqueline C T Close, A L Whone, Y Ben-Shlomo

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Neurology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03011476 (Effect of Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors on the Gait of the Patients With Parkinson Disease Characterized by Postural Instability and Gait Disturbance), which is not on this map. Cited by 144 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
144citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
30.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03011476 phase4unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors on the Gait of the Patients With Parkinson Disease Characterized by Postural Instability and Gait Disturbance

TypeinterventionalSponsorKyung Hee University HospitalRan2017 to 2018Enrolled20ConditionsParkinson DiseaseArmsDonepezil, Placebos
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

144 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 305 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Interventions for preventing falls in Parkinson's disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Left Vagus Stimulation Modulates Contralateral Subthalamic β Power Improving the Gait in Parkinson's Disease.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2024
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. What is new in Freezing of Gait?Journal of neurology · 2026
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Analyzing the 'Bradykinesia Complex' in Parkinson's Disease.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2026
    Article

84 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Emily J HendersonSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. Electronic address: emily.henderson@bristol.ac.uk.
Stephen R LordNeuroscience Research Australia, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Matthew A BrodieNeuroscience Research Australia, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Daisy M GauntBristol Randomised Trials Collaboration, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Andrew D LawrenceSchool of Psychology and Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), Cardiff University, UK.
Jacqueline C T CloseNeuroscience Research Australia, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
A L WhoneBristol Institute of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Bristol, UK; Department of Neurology, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
Y Ben-ShlomoSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
University of Bristol · GBNeuroscience Research Australia · AUCardiff University · GBNorth Bristol NHS Trust · GBUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

Parkinson's UK F-1003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFalls are a frequent and serious complication of Parkinson's disease and are related partly to an underlying cholinergic deficit that contributes to gait and cognitive dysfunction in these patients. Gait dysfunction can lead to an increased variability of gait from one step to another, raising the likelihood of falls. In the ReSPonD trial we aimed to assess whether ameliorating this cholinergic deficit with the acetylcholinesterase inhibitor rivastigmine would reduce gait variability.

methodsWe did this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial at the North Bristol NHS Trust Hospital, Bristol, UK, in patients with Parkinson's disease recruited from community and hospital settings in the UK. We included patients who had fallen at least once in the year before enrolment, were able to walk 18 m without an aid, had no previous exposure to an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, and did not have dementia. Our clinical trials unit randomly assigned (1:1) patients to oral rivastigmine or placebo capsules (both taken twice a day) using a computer-generated randomisation sequence and web-based allocation. Rivastigmine was uptitrated from 3 mg per day to the target dose of 12 mg per day over 12 weeks. Both the trial team and patients were masked to treatment allocation. Masking was achieved with matched placebo capsules and a dummy uptitration schedule. The primary endpoint was difference in step time variability between the two groups at 32 weeks, adjusted for baseline age, cognition, step time variability, and number of falls in the previous year. We measured step time variability with a triaxial accelerometer during an 18 m walking task in three conditions: normal walking, simple dual task with phonemic verbal fluency (walking while naming words beginning with a single letter), and complex dual task switching with phonemic verbal fluency (walking while naming words, alternating between two letters of the alphabet). Analysis was by modified intention to treat; we excluded from the primary analysis patients who withdrew, died, or did not attend the 32 week assessment. This trial is registered with ISRCTN, number 19880883.

findingsBetween Oct 4, 2012 and March 28, 2013, we enrolled 130 patients and randomly assigned 65 to the rivastigmine group and 65 to the placebo group. At week 32, compared with patients assigned to placebo (59 assessed), those assigned to rivastigmine (55 assessed) had improved step time variability for normal walking (ratio of geometric means 0.72, 95% CI 0.58-0.88; p=0.002) and the simple dual task (0.79; 0.62-0.99; p=0.045). Improvements in step time variability for the complex dual task did not differ between groups (0.81, 0.60-1.09; p=0.17). Gastrointestinal side-effects were more common in the rivastigmine group than in the placebo group (p<0.0001); 20 (31%) patients in the rivastigmine group versus three (5%) in the placebo group had nausea and 15 (17%) versus three (5%) had vomiting.

interpretationRivastigmine can improve gait stability and might reduce the frequency of falls. A phase 3 study is needed to confirm these findings and show cost-effectiveness of rivastigmine treatment.

fundingParkinson's UK.

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CareAccidental FallsAgedAged, 80 and overCholinesterase InhibitorsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGait Disorders, NeurologicHumansMaleMiddle AgedParkinson DiseaseRivastigmineCholinesterase InhibitorsRivastigmine

Identifiers

PMID26795874
OpenAlexW2232968682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.