Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26795734›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2016

No strong evidence for increased risk of breast cancer 8-26 years after multiple mammograms in their 30s in females at moderate and high familial risk.

D Gareth Evans, C John Kotre, Elaine Harkness, Mary Wilson, Anthony J Maxwell, Anthony Howell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

D Gareth Evans1 Genesis Prevention Centre and Nightingale Breast Screening Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Wythenshawe, Manchester, UK.
C John Kotre3 The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Elaine Harkness1 Genesis Prevention Centre and Nightingale Breast Screening Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Wythenshawe, Manchester, UK.
Mary Wilson1 Genesis Prevention Centre and Nightingale Breast Screening Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Wythenshawe, Manchester, UK.
Anthony J Maxwell1 Genesis Prevention Centre and Nightingale Breast Screening Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Wythenshawe, Manchester, UK.
Anthony Howell1 Genesis Prevention Centre and Nightingale Breast Screening Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Wythenshawe, Manchester, UK.

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0707-10031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the risks of induction of breast tumours from frequent screening mammography in younger females.

methodsA study group of 853 females was identified who had at least 5 mammograms starting before 37 years of age, with 4 or more before the age of 40 years. These were followed up from their 40th birthday or 8 years from their first mammogram, and their cancer incidence was compared with that of a control group of 1103 females who had an average of 5 mammograms between the ages of 40 and 46 years. All females in the study were previously assessed to be at moderate familial risk or higher.

resultsThere were 43 incident breast cancers in the study group after the 8-year start point, whereas 38.3 were expected from life-table calculations (RR 1.12; 95% CI: 0.83 to 1.51). In the control group, 50 incident breast cancers developed some time after their first mammogram in follow up to age 60 years. The observed, expected ratio from life tables in this group was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.71-1.24), similar to that in the study group.

conclusionThere was no trend to greater cancer incidence in those receiving mammograms earlier. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This study shows that there is no substantial effect on the induction of additional primary breast tumours from frequent mammography starting at <37 years of age. Further work on larger numbers of females is necessary to assess longer term risks and determine whether a small excess cancer effect may be present.

Indexed as

AdultBreast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansIncidenceMammographyMass ScreeningMiddle AgedRiskTime FactorsUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID26795734
PMCPMC4986504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.