ArticleMolecular medicine reports2016
Gene expression profiling analysis contributes to understanding the association between non-syndromic cleft lip and palate, and cancer.
Article in Molecular medicine reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cancer Diagnoses in Patients With Cleft Lip and/or Palate: Increased Childhood Cancer Occurrence.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2026Article
- Integrated Phosphoproteomics Identifies TGFβ-Dependent Phosphorylation Events Linking Kinase Signaling to Autophagy in Palatogenesis.Proteomes · 2026Article
- The Intersection of the Genetic Architectures of Orofacial Clefts and Normal Facial Variation.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Construction of Gene Modules and Analysis of Prognostic Biomarkers for Cervical Cancer by Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- The correlation between CYP4F2 variants and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease risk in Hainan Han population.Respiratory research · 2020Article
- Validation of Gene Profiles for Analysis of Regional Lymphatic Metastases in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2020Article
- Systems genetics of nonsyndromic orofacial clefting provides insights into its complex aetiology.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2019Article
- Analysis of dermal fibroblasts isolated from neonatal and child cleft lip and adult skin: Developmental implications on reconstructive surgery.International journal of molecular medicine · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study aimed to investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying non‑syndromic cleft lip, with or without cleft palate (NSCL/P), and the association between this disease and cancer. The GSE42589 data set was downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database, and contained seven dental pulp stem cell samples from children with NSCL/P in the exfoliation period, and six controls. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were screened using the RankProd method, and their potential functions were revealed by pathway enrichment analysis and construction of a pathway interaction network. Subsequently, cancer genes were obtained from six cancer databases, and the cancer‑associated protein‑protein interaction network for the DEGs was visualized using Cytoscape. In total, 452 upregulated and 1,288 downregulated DEGs were screened. The upregulated DEGs were significantly enriched in the arachidonic acid metabolism pathway, including PTGDS, CYP4F2 and PLA2G16; and transforming growth factor (TGF)‑β signaling pathway, including SMAD3 and TGFB2. The downregulated DEGs were distinctly involved in the pathways of DNA replication, including MCM2 and POLA1; cell cycle, including CDK1 and STAG1; and viral carcinogenesis, including PIK3CA and HIST1H2BF. Furthermore, the pathways of cell cycle and viral carcinogenesis, with higher degrees of interaction were found to interact with other pathways, including DNA replication, transcriptional misregulation in cancer, and the TGF‑β signaling pathway. Additionally, TP53, CDK1, SMAD3, PIK3R1 and CASP3, with higher degrees, interacted with the cancer genes. In conclusion, the DEGs for NSCL/P were implicated predominantly in the TGF‑β signaling pathway, the cell cycle and in viral carcinogenesis. The TP53, CDK1, SMAD3, PIK3R1 and CASP3 genes were found to be associated, not only with NSCL/P, but also with cancer. These results may contribute to a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms of NSCL/P.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.