Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26795590›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2016

Newborn screening for Krabbe disease in New York State: the first eight years' experience.

Joseph J Orsini, Denise M Kay, Carlos A Saavedra-Matiz, David A Wenger, Patricia K Duffner, Richard W Erbe, Chad Biski, Monica Martin, Lea M Krein, Matthew Nichols and 14 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Homozygosity for a Clinically SignificantInternational journal of neonatal screening · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Newborn Screening Is on a Collision Course with Public Health Ethics.International journal of neonatal screening · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 15 institutions in 1 country.

Joseph J OrsiniLaboratory of Human Genetics, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York, USA.
Denise M KayLaboratory of Human Genetics, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9928-2698
Carlos A Saavedra-MatizLaboratory of Human Genetics, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York, USA.
David A WengerLysosomal Diseases Testing Laboratory, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Patricia K DuffnerHunter James Kelly Research Institute, University of Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Richard W ErbeDepartment of Pediatrics, Women and Children's Hospital of Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Chad BiskiLaboratory of Human Genetics, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2075-1528
Monica MartinLaboratory of Human Genetics, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7850-4941
Lea M KreinLaboratory of Human Genetics, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York, USA.
Matthew NicholsLaboratory of Human Genetics, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York, USA.
Joanne KurtzbergDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Maria L EscolarUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Darius J AdamsDivision of Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York, USA.
Georgianne L ArnoldUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Alejandro IglesiasDepartment of Pediatrics, Columbia University Medicine Center, New York, New York, USA.
Patricia Galvin-PartonDepartment of Pediatrics, University Medical Center at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York, USA.
David F KronnDepartment of Pediatrics, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA.
Jennifer M KwonDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7720-2490
Paul A LevyDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital at Montefiore, Bronx, New York, USA.
Joan E PellegrinoDepartment of Pediatrics, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, USA.
Natasha ShurDivision of Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York, USA.
Melissa P WassersteinDepartment of Pediatrics, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Michele CagganaLaboratory of Human Genetics, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York, USA.
New York State Krabbe Disease Consortium
Wadsworth Center · USNew York State Department of Health · USAlbany Medical Center Hospital · USUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · USChildren's Hospital at Montefiore · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USDuke University · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USNew York Medical College · USSUNY Upstate Medical University · USThomas Jefferson University · USUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · USUniversity Hospital and Clinics · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USWomen & Children's Hospital of Buffalo · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeKrabbe disease (KD) results from galactocerebrosidase (GALC) deficiency. Infantile KD symptoms include irritability, progressive stiffness, developmental delay, and death. The only potential treatment is hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. New York State (NYS) implemented newborn screening for KD in 2006.

methodsDried blood spots from newborns were assayed for GALC enzyme activity using mass spectrometry, followed by molecular analysis for those with low activity (≤12% of the daily mean). Infants with low enzyme activity and one or more mutations were referred for follow-up diagnostic testing and neurological examination.

resultsOf >1.9 million screened, 620 infants were subjected to molecular analysis and 348 were referred for diagnostic testing. Five had enzyme activities and mutations consistent with infantile KD and manifested clinical/neurodiagnostic abnormalities. Four underwent transplantation, two are surviving with moderate to severe handicaps, and two died from transplant-related complications. The significance of many sequence variants identified is unknown. Forty-six asymptomatic infants were found to be at moderate to high risk for disease.

conclusionsThe positive predictive value of KD screening in NYS is 1.4% (5/346) considering confirmed infantile cases. The incidence of infantile KD in NYS is approximately 1 in 394,000, but it may be higher for later-onset forms.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideAlgorithmsDried Blood Spot TestingGalactosylceramidaseHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansInfant, NewbornLeukodystrophy, Globoid CellMass SpectrometryNeonatal ScreeningNew YorkPredictive Value of TestsTreatment OutcomeGalactosylceramidase

Identifiers

PMID26795590
OpenAlexW2329609955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.