Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26794716›Full record

ArticleCytotherapy2016

Collagen Type II enhances chondrogenic differentiation in agarose-based modular microtissues.

Ramkumar Tiruvannamalai Annamalai, David R Mertz, Ethan L H Daley, Jan P Stegemann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cytotherapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. 3D-bioprinting for joint regeneration.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Advances in Barrier Membranes for Guided Bone Regeneration Techniques.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ramkumar Tiruvannamalai AnnamalaiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
David R MertzDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Ethan L H DaleyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Jan P StegemannDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. Electronic address: jpsteg@umich.edu.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Bone Regeneration Using Osteogenic and Vasculogenic Tissue ModulesR01AR062636 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI STEGEMANN, JAN P. · 2014 to 2018
$1.7M
Modular Assembly of Interdigitated Osteochondral InterfacesR21AR062709 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI STEGEMANN, JAN P. · 2013 to 2014
$343k
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR062636NIAMS NIH HHS R01AR062636NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR062709NIAMS NIH HHS R21AR062709
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND

aimsCell-based therapies have made an impact on the treatment of osteoarthritis; however, the repair and regeneration of thick cartilage defects is an important and growing clinical problem. Next-generation therapies that combine cells with biomaterials may provide improved outcomes. We have developed modular microenvironments that mimic the composition of articular cartilage as a delivery system for consistently differentiated cells.

methodsHuman bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) were embedded in modular microbeads consisting of agarose (AG) supplemented with 0%, 10% and 20% collagen Type II (COL-II) using a water-in-oil emulsion technique. AG and AG/COL-II microbeads were characterized in terms of their structural integrity, size distribution and protein content. The viability of embedded MSC and their ability to differentiate into osteogenic, adipogenic and chondrogenic lineages over 3 weeks in culture were also assessed.

resultsMicrobeads made with <20% COL-II were robust, generally spheroidal in shape and 80 ± 10 µm in diameter. MSC viability in microbeads was consistently high over a week in culture, whereas viability in corresponding bulk hydrogels decreased with increasing COL-II content. Osteogenic differentiation of MSC was modestly supported in both AG and AG/COL-II microbeads, whereas adipogenic differentiation was strongly inhibited in COL-II containing microbeads. Chondrogenic differentiation of MSC was clearly promoted in microbeads containing COL-II, compared with pure AG matrices.

conclusionsInclusion of collagen Type II in agarose matrices in microbead format can potentiate chondrogenic differentiation of human MSC. Such compositionally tailored microtissues may find utility for cell delivery in next-generation cartilage repair therapies.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsCartilage, ArticularCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedChondrogenesisCollagen Type IIHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsMicrospheresOsteoarthritisOsteogenesisSepharoseWound HealingBiocompatible MaterialsCollagen Type IISepharoseAgaroseBiomaterialsCartilage tissue engineeringChondrogenesisCollagenMesenchymal stromal cellsMicroencapsulationModular tissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID26794716
PMCPMC4724061
OpenAlexW2237296816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.