Trial reportAmerican journal of public health2016
Public Funding for Contraception, Provider Training, and Use of Highly Effective Contraceptives: A Cluster Randomized Trial.
Trial report in American journal of public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03519685 (UCSF College Health Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
UCSF College Health Study: A Cluster Randomized Trial on Contraceptive Training and Education at Community Colleges
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Intrauterine contraceptive device training and outcomes for healthcare providers in developed countries: A systematic review.PloS one · 2019Pooled it
- Training contraceptive providers to offer intrauterine devices and implants in contraceptive care: a cluster randomized trial.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2018Trial
- Contraception after medication abortion in the United States: results from a cluster randomized trial.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2018Trial
- Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Counseling and Use for Older Adolescents and Nulliparous Women.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2016Trial
- Unraveling the quality of implementation of sexual and reproductive health projects among adolescents and youths in low-income regions: a case study of the JADES 2 project in Niger in 2021.The Pan African medical journal · 2024Article
- Contraceptive access reform and abortion: Evidence from Delaware.Health services research · 2023Article
- Pediatric Resident Perspectives on Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Training: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Trainees.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2023Article
- Identification of Clinician Training Techniques as an Implementation Strategy to Improve Maternal Health: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Interpregnancy Care and Access to Long-Acting Reversible Contraception.North Carolina medical journal · 2023Article
- Article
- Change of contraceptive preference after the free-LARC program for Thai teenagers.BMC women's health · 2022Article
- Contraceptive Use and Pregnancy Outcomes Among Women Enrolled in South Carolina Medicaid Programs.Maternal and child health journal · 2021Article
- Accessibility of federally funded family planning services in South Carolina and Alabama.Preventive medicine reports · 2021Article
- Free Access to a Broad Contraceptive Method Mix and Women's Contraceptive Choice: Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa.Studies in family planning · 2021Article
- Universal access to no-cost contraception for youth in Canada.Paediatrics & child health · 2019Review
- Prescription Contraceptive Sales Following the Affordable Care Act.Maternal and child health journal · 2019Article
- Association of Access to Family Planning Services With Medicaid Expansion Among Female Enrollees in Michigan.JAMA network open · 2018Article
- Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Free of Charge, Method Initiation, and Abortion Rates in Finland.American journal of public health · 2018Article
- Mapping Long-acting Reversible Contraceptive Interventions to the Social Ecological Model: A Scoping Review.Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's HealthArticle
- Women's Postabortion Contraceptive Preferences and Access to Family Planning Services in Mississippi.Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's HealthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesWe determined whether public funding for contraception was associated with long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) use when providers received training on these methods.
methodsWe evaluated the impact of a clinic training intervention and public funding on LARC use in a cluster randomized trial at 40 randomly assigned clinics across the United States (2011-2013). Twenty intervention clinics received a 4-hour training. Women aged 18 to 25 were enrolled and followed for 1 year (n = 1500: 802 intervention, 698 control). We estimated the effects of the intervention and funding sources on LARC initiation with Cox proportional hazards models with shared frailty.
resultsWomen at intervention sites had higher LARC initiation than those at control (22 vs 18 per 100 person-years; adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] = 1.43; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.04, 1.98). Participants receiving care at clinics with Medicaid family planning expansion programs had almost twice the initiation rate as those at clinics without (25 vs 13 per 100 person-years; AHR = 2.26; 95% CI = 1.59, 3.19). LARC initiation also increased among participants with public (AHR = 1.56; 95% CI = 1.09, 2.22) but not private health insurance.
conclusionsPublic funding and provider training substantially improve LARC access.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.