ArticleJournal of advances in medical education & professionalism2016
Research priorities in medical education at Shiraz University of Medical Sciences:categories and subcategories in the Iranian context.
Article in Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global research agenda for health professionals education: a systematic scoping review.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Barriers of Critical Thinking in Medical Students' Curriculum from the Viewpoint of Medical Education Experts: A Qualitative Study.Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism · 2020Article
- Setting research priorities to achieve long-term health targets in Iran.Journal of global health · 2018Article
- Using Modified Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) to assess undergraduate medical students.Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism · 2018Article
- The perception of hidden curriculum among undergraduate medical students: a qualitative study.BMC research notes · 2018Article
- Early clinical exposure program in learning renal physiology.Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism · 2017Article
- Program evaluation of an Integrated Basic Science Medical Curriculum in Shiraz Medical School, Using CIPP Evaluation Model.Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism · 2017Article
- Setting Agenda for Medical Education Research in Pakistan.Pakistan journal of medical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionResearch in education is a globally significant issue without a long history. Due to the importance of the issue in Health System Development programs, this study intended to determine research priorities in medical education, considering their details and functions. By determining barriers existing in research in education progress, it is tried to make research priorities more functional by recommending acceptable strategies.
methodsThis is a qualitative-descriptive study in two descriptive phases. The goal of these phases was to determine research priorities subcategories in medical education by Nominal Group Technique (NGT) and two rounds of Delphi method. Through the first phase, subcategories of research priorities were determined, using Nominal Group Technique under medical education experts' supervision. Through two rounds of Delphi, a questionnaire was constructed based on the subcategories. Eventually, research priorities were determined based on their highest score (scores more than 7 out of 10).
resultsIn the first phase (NGT), 35 priorities in 5 major fields of medical education were presented. In the second phase, priorities were scored, using Delphi method. Medical Ethics and professionalism gained the highest scores (7.63±1.26) and educational evaluation the lowest (7.28±1.52). In this stage, 7 items were omitted but 2 of them were added again after experts' revision in the third round of Delphi.
conclusionAccording to the results of the present study and based on previous studies, it really seems that the fields of "Learning and Teaching Approaches" and "Medical Ethics and Professionalism" were more important. Because of financial and resource limitations in our country and the importance of research priorities, it is recommended to frequently study "research priorities determination program" at universities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26793723PMC4711813What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.