Cisplatin Radiosensitization of DNA Irradiated with 2-20 eV Electrons: Role of Transient Anions.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Cell-cycle-specific lesion evolution rather than inhibition of double-strand-break repair underpins cisplatin radiosensitization.Molecular oncology · 2026
   Article
2. Low-Energy Electron Damage to Condensed-Phase DNA and Its Constituents.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
   Review
3. Reaction of Electrons with DNA: Radiation Damage to Radiosensitization.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
   Review
4. Clustered DNA Damages induced by 0.5 to 30 eV Electrons.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
   Review
5. Convection-Enhanced Delivery in Malignant Gliomas: A Review of Toxicity and Efficacy.Journal of oncology · 2019
   Review
6. Absolute cross-sections for DNA strand breaks and crosslinks induced by low energy electrons.Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2016
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Funding

Abstract