Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26793275›Full record

ArticleMolecular cytogenetics2016

Genomic organization of repetitive DNAs highlights chromosomal evolution in the genus Clarias (Clariidae, Siluriformes).

Nuntiya Maneechot, Cassia Fernanda Yano, Luiz Antonio Carlos Bertollo, Nuntaporn Getlekha, Wagner Franco Molina, Sukhonthip Ditcharoen, Bundit Tengjaroenkul, Weerayuth Supiwong, Alongklod Tanomtong, Marcelo de Bello Cioffi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cytogenetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mixed modes of satellite DNA and transposable element evolution, which shape the repetitive landscape of air-breathing catfishes (Clarias).Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Cytogenetics of TwoZoological studies · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nuntiya ManeechotDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, Muang District Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Cassia Fernanda YanoDepartamento de Genética e Evolução, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, São Paulo Brazil.
Luiz Antonio Carlos BertolloDepartamento de Genética e Evolução, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, São Paulo Brazil.
Nuntaporn GetlekhaDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, Muang District Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Wagner Franco MolinaDepartamento de Biologia Celular e Genética, Centro de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN Brazil.
Sukhonthip DitcharoenDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, Muang District Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Bundit TengjaroenkulDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Muang, Khon Kaen 40002 Thailand ; Toxic Substances in Livestock and Aquatic Animals Research Group, Khon Kaen University, Muang, Khon Kaen 40002 Thailand.
Weerayuth SupiwongFaculty of Applied Science and Engineering, Khon Kaen University, Nong Khai Campus, Muang, Nong Khai 43000 Thailand.
Alongklod TanomtongDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, Muang District Khon Kaen, Thailand ; Toxic Substances in Livestock and Aquatic Animals Research Group, Khon Kaen University, Muang, Khon Kaen 40002 Thailand.
Marcelo de Bello CioffiDepartamento de Genética e Evolução, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, São Paulo Brazil.
Khon Kaen University · THUniversidade Federal de São Carlos · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe genus Clarias (Clariidae, Siluriformes) contains at least 61 species naturally spread over vast regions of Asia, India and Africa. However, Clarias species have also been introduced in many different countries and represent the most widespread catfishes in the world. These fishes are also known as "walking catfishes" due to their ability to move over land. A large degree of chromosomal variation has been previously found in this family, mainly using conventional cytogenetic investigations, with diploid chromosome numbers ranging between 48 and 100. In this study, we analyzed the karyotype structure and distribution of four repetitive DNA sequences (5S and 18S rDNAs and (CA)15 and (GA)15 microsatellites) in three Clarias species (C. batrachus, C. gariepinus, C. macrocephalus), as well as in a probable natural hybrid of the two latter species from different Thailand river basins.

resultsClarias gariepinus and C. macrocephalus had 2n = 56 and 2n = 54, respectively, as well as karyotypes composed mainly by metacentric and submetacentric chromosomes. Their karyotypes differed in the number and location of 5S and 18S rDNA sites and in the degree of microsatellite accumulation. An intermediate chromosomal pattern incorporating those of the parental species was found in the probable hybrid, confirming its interspecific origin. Clarias batrachus had 2n = 104 chromosomes and its karyotype was dominated by mainly acrocentric elements, indicating that unusual multiple centric fissions were involved in its karyotype differentiation. The karyotype of this species presented an unexpected dispersion of ribosomal DNAs, possessing 54 and 12 sites of 5S and 18S rDNAs, respectively, as well as a high accumulation and differential distribution of both microsatellite repeats, representing 'hot spots' for chromosomal rearrangement.

conclusionBoth conventional and molecular cytogenetic markers were useful tools for demonstrating remarkable evolutionary dynamism and highlighting multiple chromosomal rearrangements and hybridization events correlated with the notable karyotypic diversity of these walking catfishes.

Indexed as

Centric fissionChromosomal rearrangementsFISHKaryotype evolutionMolecular cytogenetics

Identifiers

PMID26793275
PMCPMC4719708
OpenAlexW2283212458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.